Sunday, January 5, 2025

Vanished Out of Sight, a.k.a. Blind River (Anthem Entertainment, Lifetime, 2025)


by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2025 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Last night (Saturday, January 4) I watched two Lifetime movies, now that Lifetime has abandoned their saccharine holiday programming and returned to their usual formula of what New York Times critic Maureen Dowd called “Pussies in Peril.” The Lifetime Web site didn’t list the movie they were showing at 8 p.m., but it turned out to be unexpectedly good. The credits on Lifetime’s version gave the title as Vanished Out of Sight, which imdb.com didn’t have a listing for, but it turned up under the alternate title Blind River. Both titles are references to this one’s pussy in peril, Claire Moyer (Annalise Basso), being literally blind. She’s living alone with her six-year-old daughter Briar (Avalon Reign) and dating a hot-looking Black man named Beck Harris (Tracy Campbell), who lives with his uncle Elijah (Leajato Amara Robinson). Beck proposes marriage to Claire and would like to move in together once they tie the knot, but Claire is reticent. When Briar disappears without an apparent trace and the sheriff’s deputies in Kosciusko County, Indiana ask Claire if she’s notified Briar’s father, Claire says, “She doesn’t have a father.” While this is biologically impossible, we at first take it to mean either that Claire’s father is dead or his relationship with Claire, such as it was, ended so badly Claire has literally written him out of Briar’s life. Claire was so neurotically overprotective of Briar, to the point of freaking out and forbidding her to ride the bike Beck gave her for Christmas (this takes place around the holidays) unless someone else is watching her the whole time. Periodically we see flashbacks to some really traumatic incident in Claire’s earlier life, as well as scenes between Claire and Briar before Briar disappeared. The police investigation into Briar’s disappearance is led by a Kosciusko County, Indiana sheriff’s deputy named Walker Donley (Steven Ogg) and includes Hooper Miller (Jay Huguley) and his mother, Reece Miller (Denise Smolarek), who live together as well as serving on the force, and also a young blond hunk who seems to hang around in the back. (The film was shot in the small town of Mentone, Indiana, where it takes place, rather than asking us to believe that Anywhere, Canada is really in the U.S.)

There’s also a grizzled old mountain man named Abel Wood (Wynn Reichert) whom we see several times carrying a hunting rifle he seems to be aiming to shoot at any passers-by who cross the line onto his property, as well as a hardware worker (Oliver Pettit) who had the misfortune to be on one of those lists of convicted sex offenders. The hardware guy is first targeted by the police as part of a “round up the usual suspects” reach-out to the three registered sex criminals who live in the neighborhood, but he becomes a real figure of pathos as well as a red herring. He’s living in a house inherited from his late father, and because it’s within 100 yards of a school the police order him to sell the place and move – and he doesn’t want to do that, not least because the house is in an acute state of disrepair and it will need more work than he can afford to bring it up to salable condition. Midway through the movie writer-director Carissa Stutzman – who does an excellent job in both tasks – lets us know that Claire’s relentless overprotectiveness of Briar has to do with her own status as a rape victim seven years earlier, and ultimately it dawns on us that Briar is the result of that rape. Stutzman also has Claire realize who her rapist was after all these years when he hears the sounds Hooper Miller makes around her house while he’s ostensibly investigating the case and recognizes them as those her rapist made. It turns out [spoiler alert!] that the real villain is Hooper’s mother Reece, who was well aware that Hooper was both Claire’s rapist and Briar’s father. Assigned by the Kosciusko County Sheriff’s Department to investigate the original rape, Reece talked Claire out of undergoing a rape kit and essentially buried the investigation to protect her son. Now, the thought of having Hooper’s daughter living with a Black stepfather hooks the Millers’ racism big-time and they determine to kidnap Briar and have Hooper raise her as his own so she won’t be calling a Black man “dad.”

They also hamper Claire’s own attempts to investigate the case by killing her service dog, Stevie; Claire later explains that she originally hired someone else to off the dog but when he bungled the job, she did it herself. And Claire doesn’t do her cause any favors when she goes out and stands on a bridge over the town’s river and accidentally drops her cell phone in the water, thereby losing the ability to get in touch with anyone when she gets in trouble. What’s more, when Beck also disappears, the police put out an all-points bulletin treating him as an armed and dangerous fugitive – he’s really been beaten within an inch of his life by the Millers, mère et fils, and left to die in their house, though Claire has managed to drag him outside and bury his body under leaves. We don’t know for sure whether Beck is alive or dead until the tag scene, which shows him, Claire and Briar as one big happy family after the traumatic events of the film. What makes Vanished Out of Sight a.k.a. Blind River especially good for a Lifetime film (in fact, especially good, period) is writer-director Stutzman’s creative use of the various elements of film, especially sound. Working from the premise that blind people often become hyperacute in their other senses to make up for their lack of sight, Stutzman and her sound mixer, Joseph Vnuck, work quite creatively and heighten sounds that are usually just background noises so we get an idea of how Claire perceives the world. There’s also a scene in which she reacts to a flashlight shone straight into her face, which suggests that she’s not totally blind and can at least see bright lights. Stutzman also gets a great performance from Annalise Basso, who’s totally convincing as a blind person; I’ve seen major stars playing disabled people less believably than this. Vanished Out of Sight is one of the occasional gems Lifetime gives us, a welcome respite from their usual formulae and a legitimate extension of their “pussies in peril” approach. Stutzman even gives us a shot of Hooper Miller at the end holding his daughter and clutching her that suggests he has genuine affection for her and isn’t just a stick-figure villain. Carissa Stutzman is clearly a major filmmaker and I hope she gets some opportunities for the feature-film assignments she definitely deserves.

The Last Thing She Said (CMW Horizon Productions, Champlain Media, Reel One Entertainment, Lifetime, 2025)


by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2025 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Alas, after the relative excellence of Vanished Out of Sight, Lifetime reverted to formula with their next film, The Last Thing She Said. Set in Seattle – we know that because the first thing we see is a long shot of the Space Needle – it deals with Kate Winslow (Kylee Bush), who’s just graduated from college after having worked her way through school as a waitress and still ending up saddled with a big student-loan debt. It’s not clear just what she was trained to do, but she interviews with a company called Solution Marketing and gets hired by a lecherous supervisor named Eric Clark (Jonathan Hawley Purvis). We know he’s a letch because of the way he stares at her during the interview – it’s obvious he wants to hire her mainly to get in her pants, though he’s wearing a tight brown pullover that shows off his nipples quite nicely and had me in a state of lust over him. On her first day she’s told that she’ll be working nights and weekends to get out a major project the company is working on, and she’s in her office after the usual hours when suddenly the lights go out. It turns out that the janitorial crew, a heavy-set middle-aged woman named Maria Stan (Jill Teed) and her 20-ish son Stephan (Lucas Penner) who’s “mentally challenged,” “learning-disabled” or whatever the current P.C. euphemism for “slow” or the “R-word,” turned out the lights to save electricity and didn’t realize anyone was still working there. Maria offers to take Kate to a late supper at a restaurant she knows, and the next day (or a few days later; Don Woodman’s script wasn’t clear which) Stephan gives Kate a bouquet of red roses. Alas, Eric catches him offering Stephan the bouquet and summarily fires Stephan, saying it’s totally inappropriate for a mere janitor to be cruising one of his office workers. The moment he says that, we hate him for his classism as well as his untoward attentions towards Kate.

Ultimately he and Kate go back to Kate’s place for what she thinks is just another late work session while he’s there with seduction on his mind – only they’re interrupted by Kate’s ex, Matt Stone (Tyler Cody), who’s there to pick up a box of his things to take to his new place. The next day Kate is overpowered by an unseen assailant as she gets into her car to go home, though that happens half an hour into the film at the first commercial break and we don’t get to see who it is. The next time we see Kate, she’s been bound hand and foot and handcuffed and chained to a bed, with a gag in her mouth. Nobody in the office, including Eric and her Black best friend Hayley T. (Shastina Kumar) – we never learn her last name but we get the initial from an e-mail inbox we see – has any idea where she is. Ultimately the police detectives on the case, Josh Wilson (Curtis Lovell) and Ann Davis (Alana Hawley Purvis), arrest Eric Clark for kidnapping and murdering Kate based on forged evidence against him the Stans have planted in his trash can and his bed (since Maria and Stephan were also hired to clean Eric’s home, and therefore Maria had his keys). The police are taken in by Maria’s innocent-victim act, even when Matt shows up at their home suspicious that they’re holding Kate against her will and finds a charm bracelet she always wore. Maria clubs him to death, reports it to the police, and is able to convince Josh – who’s already been established as a friend of hers off-duty – that she acted in self-defense and he shouldn’t investigate further. The police do a good-faith search of the Stans’ home and find a small room in the basement where Stephan has a drum set – though we’ve never actually seen him practice on it; his chief avocation is highly violent video games, which he plays while muttering aloud about how many people he’s killing. It turns out the room where they’re holding Kate was a separate basement under the main one that was originally built as a fallout shelter (ya remember fallout shelters?), and once the cops get hold of the original plans for the house they realize what happened to Kate and where she is.

It was a nice touch on writer Woodman’s part to have Ann Davis, the cop who isn’t a personal friend of Maria Stan, be the one who finally catches on to what she and her son are up to. But overall The Last Thing She Said (a title that suggests the plot is going to revolve around Kate’s last words, which it doesn’t) is yet another Lifetime movie about two crazy kidnappers who think that even though they’re holding their victim against her will, sooner or later they will “break” her and she’ll accept and even love her new-found “family.” There’s also a wrinkle that Maria is determined that Kate will have Stephan’s baby, and when Kate declares that she’d rather die that have sex with Stephan; Maria says that’s not going to be a problem. Having previously worked as a nurse – which gave her a thorough knowledge of incapacitating drugs she’s used to keep Kate under control – Maria knows how to do artificial insemination and proposes to use that to force Kate to conceive Stephan’s child. It all ends with Stephan giving his mom one of her own drugs after she threatens to kill Kate once Kate is no longer of use to them, and then the cops arrive in the nick of time, arrest both of them, and set Eric (ya remember Eric?) free. One thing that really irked me about this movie was its politics, which seemed all too fitting on the eve of President Donald Trump 2.0; of course in this Right-wing age the proletarians are going to be the bad guys and the hot young executive who regards himself as entitled to any even remotely attractive woman in his employ is going to be portrayed as the innocent victim! The Last Thing She said was directed by Danny J. Boyle – the other Danny Boyle from the one who’s directed Academy Award-winning movies like Slumdog Millionaire and Trainspotting – and as usual this Boyle is a technically efficient and competent but unimaginative director who does the best he can with a pretty rotten and sorry script.

Friday, January 3, 2025

Gaslight (British National Films, D&P Studios, 1940)


by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2025 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Last night (Thursday, January 2) I watched an intriguing film on Turner Classic Movies: the 1940 British film of Gaslight, directed by Thorold Dickinson from a script by A. R. Rawlinson and Bridget Boland based on a 1938 play called Gas Light (two words) by Patrick Hamilton. A year after this 1940 film, Hamilton’s play was adapted for Broadway under a new title, Angel Street, and MGM bought the movie rights to Angel Street but changed the title to Gaslight (one word, as in the British film) and in 1944 made an artistic masterpiece that was also a blockbuster commercial hit, directed by George Cukor from a script by John Van Druten, Walter Reisch and John L. Balderston. It also won the Academy Award for Ingrid Bergman as Best Actress (the first of her two). Not wanting a cheap distributor to pick up the rights to the 1940 British Gaslight and pass it off as their movie, MGM bought all rights to the 1940 Gaslight and ordered all prints destroyed. Fortunately, director Dickinson was able to have a bootleg print struck from the original negative; he concealed it in his home and it was subsequently rediscovered. In Dickinson’s version, the female victim is called Bella Mallen and is played by Diana Wynyard, while her husband and tormentor, Paul Mallen, is played by Anton Walbrook. In Cukor’s, they were renamed Paula Alquist and Gregory Anton and were played by Ingrid Bergman and Charles Boyer. The 1940 Gaslight is in the same category as the 1922 silent Camille with Alla Nazimova and Rudolph Valentino, and the 1931 The Maltese Falcon with Ricardo Cortez and Bebe Daniels: a solidly produced film of real quality eclipsed by an even better remake.

The biggest weakness of the 1940 Gaslight as compared to the 1944 version was the elimination of the long prologue at Lake Como in Italy, in which the heroine first meets the villain and falls in love with him. Instead the Dickinson original begins with the villain, unseen at the time except in a couple of long-shots that clue us in to the fact that Walbrook’s character is the killer as soon as we meet him full-face, strangling and killing Bella’s aunt, Alice Barlow (Marie Wright). His motive is robbery, specifically to steal her ample cache of jewels; no sooner has he offed her than we see him rifle her jewel box like a bargain hunter at a particularly attractive sale. Alas, the real prizes of her collection are a batch of uncut rubies which she’s hidden somewhere else in her home – but where? Five years later the crook, going under the name “Paul Mallen,” has married his original victim’s niece and leased the same house in which Aunt Alice lived so he can continue his search for the priceless rubies at his leisure. Bella is suspicious that she’s losing her mind, though of course it’s really Paul that is quietly playing tricks on her and making her doubt her sanity. She first thinks she’s going crazy when the gas light in her bedroom dims because Paul is searching the house next door for the elusive rubies, and since the gas connections are linked every time he turns on the gas in the house next door to look for the gems, it dims the lights in his own house. After forcibly keeping her at home on the basis that her doctors have already declared her insane and if she leaves, she’ll prove it to them and get herself committed to a mental hospital, he finally lets her go to a benefit concert at a private home. Only he insists that she wear a brooch which she can’t find – he’s really stolen it and hid it in his own desk drawer – and at the concert he accuses her of stealing his watch, which he really planted in her purse. He makes such a big commotion about this that not only do the other members of the audience react, so does the pianist who’s giving the concert, and the two make an early exit. Later Paul chews out Bella for starting an embarrassing scene in public, when we know it was all his fault. He even makes his two maids, Elizabeth (Minnie Rayner) and Nancy (Cathleen Cordell), swear on a Bible that they didn’t steal his watch, and when Bella insists on doing the same, Paul thunders that she shouldn’t add sacrilege to all her other sins.

Paul is also carrying on an affair with Nancy, whom he takes to a music hall, even though Nancy already has a boyfriend, Cobb (Jimmy Hanley). The good guy in all of this, who was played by Joseph Cotten in the 1944 film, is Rough (Frank Pettingell, who played Sir John Falstaff in the 1960 British TV miniseries An Age of Kings – and quite frankly played him wretchedly, going way over the top, in one of the few casting glitches in that otherwise generally well-acted series). While Brian Cameron, the character Cotten played in the 1944 version, was an active-duty police officer, Rough is a retired police detective who worked the original murder of Alice Barlow while he was still on the force and got obsessed with it. Ultimately Rough persuades Bella that she’s really sane and it’s her husband who is driving her crazy, and ultimately she’s able to overpower him, tie him up and threaten to kill him, saying that because he’s done such a good job of convincing people she’s crazy she can kill him with impunity. Eventually Rough gets two people currently on the police force to arrest Paul, and in a weirdly touching scene the cops let him fondle the now-found rubies just before they take him into custody. The final scene shows Bella, free at last, opening the doors to her back yard and stepping out into the sunlight, a symbol of her freedom from her oppressive marriage. David O. Selznick, who wasn’t involved in the 1944 Gaslight except through loaning out Ingrid Bergman and Joseph Cotten to play in it, wrote a memo urging Cukor and his writers to copy that final scene in their film.

Overall, the 1940 Gaslight is a quite good film but one that pales by comparison to its near-perfect remake; one can certainly be grateful to Thorold Dickinson for preserving it. We can also be grateful that Dickinson obviously learned so much from the master of suspense, Alfred Hitchcock; much of the 1940 Gaslight looks like a Hitchcock movie, with long, vertiginous camera movements; scenes taking place on staircases; and an overall atmosphere of darkness and gloom. Like the movie as a whole, the cast in this version is good but the one in the remake is even better. Diana Wynyard is great in the lead but Ingrid Bergman was even better (particularly in expressing the character’s heartbreak: it really helped that she got that extended prologue to show why she was so desperately in love with her husband, while Wynyard didn’t and we spend much of the 1940 Gaslight wondering, “Why doesn’t she just leave the S.O.B. already?”), and Anton Walbrook is fine but doesn’t do the romantic aspects of the character as well as Boyer. And while Frank Pettingell isn’t as insufferable here as he’d be as Falstaff in An Age of Kings, he’s a far cry from Joseph Cotten – even though one of Selznick’s criticisms of the 1944 version was Cukor and the writers hinting at a future romantic attraction between Bergman’s and Cotten’s characters. (Selznick thought that was a mistake, though in a way it brought the story even closer to Hitchcock and in particular his penchant for hero-heroine-villain love triangles.) While the 1944 Gaslight is clearly better than the 1940 version, it’s nice to have the earlier one available as a surprisingly good alternative.

Thursday, January 2, 2025

Vienna Philharmonic New Year's Concert 2024/2025 (Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra, ORF, Sony, PBS, aired January 1, 2025)


by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2025 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Last night (Wednesday, January 1) at 8 my husband Charles and I watched the annual Vienna Philharmonic New Year’s concert, which began in 1939 when conductor Clemens Krauss decided the Austrians needed a feel-good event to get over their takeover by the Nazis. So he started this tradition which mostly featured the music of the Strauss family: father Johann I, sons Johann II, Josef and Eduard; and Johann Strauss III, who was not Johann II’s son but Eduard’s! The event has become an annual tradition and a major cash cow for the Vienna Philharmonic. It’s televised by the state-owned Austrian broadcasting company ORF (short for Österreicher Rundfunk), which sends videos around the world to various countries that consist of the complete concert plus an ample supply of B-roll which can be edited by TV networks and stations any way they like. The American rights are held by PBS, which almost always shows only the second half of the concert. They also use a narrator – originally Walter Cronkite, then Julie Andrews (who had at least a faint connection with Austria since her best-known movie, The Sound of Music, takes place there – but in Salzburg, Mozart’s birthplace, rather than Vienna), and now Hugh Bonneville. Hugh Bonneville is a heavy-set middle-aged British actor whose main claim to fame is as the lead on the long-running British TV series Downton Abbey, though at least he pronounces the “t” in “often” (a long-running in-joke between Charles and I). This year’s conductor was Riccardo Muti, whom I’m old enough to remember when he was a hot young 20-something firebrand on the podium; today, in his seventh appearance leading the New Year’s concert, he’s considerably older and nowhere near as sexy, though that’s true of all of us as well. He conducted in a businesslike manner, effective and efficient but not sparkling.

The concert – or at least the part of it we Americans got to see – began with Johann Strauss, II’s overture to his operetta The Gypsy Baron, whose Wikipedia page describes it as “[t]he story of the marriage of a landowner (returned from exile) and a gypsy girl who is revealed as the daughter of a Turkish pasha, and the rightful owner of a hidden treasure. [It] involves a fortune-telling Romany queen, a self-important mayor, a rascally commissioner, a military governor, a band of gypsies and a troop of hussars.” (In other words, it’s a few more chips from the operetta log, though music critics have suggested that Strauss’s music for The Gypsy Baron was edging past operetta and towards the greater sophistication of opera.) The next selection was also by Johann II (he’s by far the most famous of the Strausses and the composer of “On the Beautiful Blue Danube” and the other Strauss works you’re likely to have heard of): the “Accelerations Waltz,” composed in 1860 for the Engineering Students’ Ball at the Vienna Sofiensaal (a legendary hall that was used for countless major recordings in the 1960’s and 1970’s, including the first complete studio recording of Wagner’s Der Ring des Nibelungen, until it burned down in 2001 and was rebuilt in 2013). The third piece was the first by a non-Strauss composer: Joseph Hellmesberger, Jr. (apparently the Strausses weren’t the only ones who kept it in the family; not only did he follow in his father’s footsteps as a musician but he became the director of the Vienna Conservatory and a string quartet on his dad’s retirement) whose official German title is Fidele Bruder March but was announced last night as “Merry Brothers’ March.” (My understanding was that “Fidele” meant “faithful,” not “merry,” but we’ll let that stand.)

Afterwards Muti and the Vienna Philharmonic played the Ferdinandus Waltz, composed by Constanze Geiger, one of the many women composers who have been dredged up from obscurity to satisfy the demands of orchestra leaders these days for more “politically correct” programming. Quite a few female composers have been brought into the light, including not only relatives of famous men (like Robert Schumann’s wife Clara and Felix Mendelssohn’s sister Fanny) but people like Louise Farrenc and Mel (short for Melanie) Bonis as well as Florence Price, an African-American woman who faced the double whammy of being female and being Black. Geiger married Prince Leopold of Saxe-Coburg und Gotha, though it was a “morganatic marriage” – meaning that she would get a noble title out of it but their kids wouldn’t. This march is a perfectly respectable piece of light music that fit in well with the overall program. The next few pieces were lesser-known works by the Strausses: Johann II’s “Either/Or Polka,” Josef’s “Transaction Waltz,” and Johann II’s “Annen Polka” and “Chit-Chat Polka.” After that came one of the big pieces: Johann II’s “Wine, Woman and Song” (though we could see on one of the musicians’ music stand the original German title, “Wein, Weib und Gesänge,” which struck me as odd because “Weib” means “wife,” not “woman” – the usual German word for “woman” is “Frau,” though even that usually means a married woman and an unmarried woman is a “Fräulein”). As he pretty much did through the entire concert, Muti conducted pretty much on autopilot, pacing the orchestra through well-judged tempi but not bringing much imagination or flair to the music.

“Wine, Woman and Song” brought the “official” part of the program to an end, but there followed the three obligatory “encores” (the word is in quotes because there’s really no question as to whether or not they’re going to happen). One is of a piece of the conductor’s own choice (and oh, how I wish someday a sufficiently subversive conductor would demand that the orchestra play Ravel’s “La Valse,” his destruction of the Viennese waltz tradition composed during World War I, in which Austria and France were on opposite sides) and the other two are Johann II’s “The Blue Danube” and Johann I’s “Radetzky March.” This time the conductor’s own choice was another work by Johann II: “The Bayadere (Quick Polka)” from a Strauss operetta with the engaging and intriguing title Indigo and the Forty Thieves (based on the Arabian Nights tale Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves, with a German libretto by Maximilian Steiner, premiered in Vienna in 1871). Muti introduced a new wrinkle into the traditional performance of “Blue Danube”: the conductor is supposed to play the first few bars, then stop and say, in German, “The Vienna Philharmonic wants to wish you a … ”, and then the orchestra chants in unison, “Happy New Year!” This time Muti did the greeting both in German and his own native language, Italian. What follows was a typical latter-day Muti performance: well played and decently paced but lacking the final bursts of energy that mark the difference between a good performance and a great one. (My all-time favorite “Blue Danube” performances are by Stokowski, Ormandy and Karajan.)

The final “Radetzky March,” written by Johann I to celebrate a particularly significant victory for Austria over Italy in the Battle of Custoza (1848), was added to the Vienna Philharmonic New Year’s concerts in 1946 by conductor Josef Krips, and in 2019 the Vienna Philharmonic commissioned a new orchestral arrangement to replace the original by Leopold Weininger, who’d written his during the Nazi era and therefore it was considered “tainted.” Overall this was a good if not great New Year’s concert, and I was amused that like some other conductors Muti turned away from the orchestra and towards the audience in the “Radetzky March,” as if he were compelled to conduct them. Midway through he turned away from both orchestra and audience, and towards the dancers in the big ballet numbers. If nothing else, this telecast answered a question I’d long had about these productions: were the dancers filmed “live,” in real time,to pre-recorded music piped in to the off-stage venues where they perform; or were they recorded and filmed earlier? This show made it clear that they’re dancing to pre-recorded music; that became clear when one of the dancers disappeared from one venue and reappeared in another much quicker than she could have got there by herself. It also featured an incredibly attractive Black male dancer whom I had the hots for almost as soon as he walked on and I could see what he was packing between his legs. In fact, the first number that included dancers featured four hunky guys and four slender but well-muscled women, and there were a couple of brief, blessed moments in which two of the male dancers hugged each other and did some kisses and joint steps on the dance floor. All in all, this Vienna Philharmonic New Year’s concert was acceptably entertaining but lacked the spark this venerable event can have – and oddly, for something I’d assumed would be one of the hottest tickets in Vienna, the shots of the audience sure included a surprising number of empty seats.

Wednesday, January 1, 2025

Sara Bareilles: Next at the Kennedy Center (John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, PBS, aired December 31, 2024)


by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2025 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Last night (Tuesday, December 31, 2024) PBS showed two episodes of the occasional TV series Next at the Kennedy Center, various performances filmed at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C. One was actually a rerun of the December 31, 2023 show featuring Cynthia Erivo with various guest performers (https://moviemagg.blogspot.com/2024/01/next-at-kennedy-center-cynthia-erivo.html); I gave that show an oddly lukewarm review at the time, focusing mainly on how much better the original versions of many of the songs were than the ones Erivo and her “friends” (Ben Platt and an amazing Black Hawai’ian named Joaquina Kalukango) gave us on that show, but I liked it a lot better last night than I did in 2023. The new show featured singer Sara Bareilles, whom I remember getting a free sampler CD promoting her first album. I played through it and decided it was nice but not so awe-inspiring as to get me to buy her CD. Last night she gave a truly stunning performance that made me wonder why I didn’t follow up with her then. She performed 13 songs, of which 11 were done with the National Symphony Orchestra (or at least a smaller ensemble drawn from it) conducted by Steven Reinecke. The other two songs, “Let the Rain” and “Soft Place to Land,” were done in a smaller room than the big Kennedy Center concert hall and featured Bareilles on guitar (mostly she played piano) with just two other musicians, Rick Moose (that’s what the chyron said!) on violin and Alan Hampton on acoustic bass. I had much the same reaction to Bareilles’s concert that I did to the most recent Taylor Swift album, The Tortured Poets Department, when I got it a few days ago at the North Park Target. Like Swift, Bareilles is a quite good female singer-songwriter working in a genre that I didn’t realize is so popular these days, writing and playing songs that acknowledge the complexities of emotional relationships but don’t go overboard on the traumas. If I’d heard either of those works in a context in which I didn’t know who they were by and thought they were by singers with cult followings that sold maybe about 2,000 copies of their albums, I’d be calling all my friends and praising them to the skies, telling my buddies, “You have to hear this!”

It’s true that Bareilles’s songs sometimes made me think she has a small room in her home in which she lights candles to a photo of Joni Mitchell; not only does Bareilles have that same sort of light, soaring voice MItchell had in her prime, she writes songs that are equally gnomic and poetically sophisticated, though she doesn’t reach the levels of mind-boggling complexity Mitchell all too often did. The songs she played with the symphony are “Orpheus,” “Love Song,” “Once Upon Another Time” (the first song on which she brought out backup singers David Ryan Harris and Emily King, and on which her vibraphonist played with a violin bow on one of his instrument’s metal bars, creating an otherworldly drone effect), “Many the Miles,” “Armor” (a surprisingly political song inspired by Bareilles’s participation in the January 2017 March on Washington for women’s rights – she joked before the song that she was glad the Trumpian nightmare was over when both she and her audience know it’s just beginning all over again, and then she looked up to the ceiling as if talking to God and said, sotto voce, “Help!”), “Gravity,” “King of Anything,” “Saint Honesty” (written after she’d had an argument with her fiancé, actor Joe Tippett, whom she met while doing the show Waitress in which they played husband and wife; they started dating for real in 2017 and they’re still together), “Enough” (from Bareilles’s new show, The Intensities), “She Used to Be Mine” (a duet with Rufus Wainwright, whom obviously she likes a whole lot better than I do!), and her signature song, “Brave.” I quite liked Sara Bareilles’s show and it was a nice enough way to ring out 2024, a year which because of the terrible outcome of the Presidential election is a year I couldn’t wait to see the end of – just as I’m sure those of my political persuasion couldn’t wait to see the end of 1924, in which Calvin Coolidge won a full term as President after the Democratic Party melted down and did an even better job of destroying itself than it did 100 years later!

Tuesday, December 31, 2024

A Complete Unknown (Range Media Pictures, The Picture Company, Searchlight Pictures, Veritas Entertainment, 2024)


by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2024 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Yesterday (Wednesday, December 30) my good friend Cat Ortiz and I went to the Landmark Hillcrest Theatres (which are closing for good in just five days, alas) to see the new movie A Complete Unknown, a biopic about Bob Dylan in general and in particular the first four years of his major career, from his arrival as an unknown would-be folk singer from Hibbing, Minnesota (his home town) in 1961 to his scandalous performance at the Newport Folk Festival in 1965, in which he played an electric guitar and played three songs (“Maggie’s Farm,” “Like a Rolling Stone,” and “It Takes a Lot to Laugh, It Takes a Train to Cry”) with the Paul Butterfield Blues Band. The shocked reaction of the crowd – as if Dylan had abandoned the One True Faith of folk music and turned his back on equality and justice to chase commercial success – is well dramatized here (though the person in the audience who cried out “Judas!” was actually from a later Dylan concert in Manchester, England in 1966) – and so is Dylan’s return to safety when he walked off the stage and returned with an acoustic guitar to play “It’s All Over Now, Baby Blue” and “Mr. Tambourine Man.” (When PBS showed a documentary of all Dylan’s appearances at the Newport Folk Festival, the audience hostility made a lot more sense. The performance was pretty mediocre; Dylan and the Butterfield band had obviously had too little time to rehearse, and audio engineers in 1965 had no idea how to mix a rock band “live” so vocals and instruments could be heard clearly instead of congealing into an unpleasant wash of sound. If you went to a rock concert in the 1960’s you expected that you’d have to play the band’s albums first just to have an idea of what the songs were about.) A Complete Unknown was directed and co-written by James Mangold, who’d already done a musical biopic, Walk the Line (2006), about Johnny Cash, who appears as a character in this movie too. (Joaquin Phoenix played Cash in Walk the Line and Boyd Holbrook plays him here.) His co-writer, Jay Cocks, used to review rock music for Time magazine.

As he’d done with Joaquin Phoenix playing Johnny Cash in Walk the Line, director Mangold had the actor who played Dylan, Timothée Chalamet, do his own singing and guitar playing, and he made that demand on the other actors playing musicians as well: Edward Norton as Pete Seeger, Monica Barbaro as Joan Baez, Boyd Holbrook as Johnny Cash, Joshua Henry as Brownie McGhee, Steve Bell as his performing partner Sonny Terry, and a stunning performance by Big Bill Morganfield (son of blues giant Muddy Waters, who was born McKinley Morganfield) as fictitious blues musician Jesse Moffette. I could have quibbles with the script – the closing credits contain a disclaimer that some of the incidents have been fictionalized for dramatic purposes, and I muttered under my breath, “You can say that again.” The film depicts Dylan signing with his first manager, Albert Grossman, before he got his contract with Columbia Records (it was really after), and shows both Grossman and Hammond scouting Dylan at Gerde’s Folk City. Hammond actually signed Dylan after another folk artist he’d signed, Carolyn Hester, brought him along to play harmonica on three songs on her album, and Hammond was struck by him and his playing and decided to give him an audition. The film also blames Hammond for Dylan’s first album being mostly covers of old folk and blues material – of its 13 songs, only two (“Talking New York” and “Song to Woody”) were Dylan originals – but the evidence is ambiguous and the Wikipedia page on Dylan’s first album describes him frantically listening to previously released folk albums by other artists searching for material. In fact, singer Dave Van Ronk (who’s depicted briefly in the movie and is played by Joe Tippett) complained that Dylan ripped off Van Ronk’s arrangement of the old New Orleans folk tune “House of the Rising Sun” for his first album after Van Ronk wanted to record it himself. Van Ronk said he could no longer perform the song once Dylan recorded it because people would think he was ripping it off Dylan. He got his revenge when British blues-rock singer Eric Burdon recorded “House of the Rising Sun” with his band, The Animals, and from then on Dylan found he couldn’t perform the song because people would think he was ripping it off of Eric Burdon! (The song is in A Complete Unknown performed by Monica Barbaro as Joan Baez, and quite frankly it makes more sense sung by a woman.)

Mangold and Cocks also muff the great story Al Kooper told about his participation as an organ player on “Like a Rolling Stone” (the Dylan classic that generated the titles for both this movie and Martin Scorsese’s Dylan documentary, No Direction Home). He showed up expecting to play guitar on the session, but during rehearsals he started noodling on the studio organ and Dylan liked what he heard and insisted Kooper play organ on the record. The producer, Tom Wilson (one of the few Black people who had that job for a major label, along with Clyde Otis at Mercury), didn’t like that idea. “He’s not even an organ player, he’s a guitar player.” “I don’t care,” Dylan said. “I like the organ. Turn it up.” The result was that Kooper made it to stardom as an organ player, and Tom Wilson got fired as Dylan’s producer and Bob Johnston took over production of the rest of the Highway 61 Revisited album. (We see a bit of that in the movie but not enough of it.) Also so much of the movie is dank and dreary-looking – Mangold and cinematographer Phedon Papamichael have a bad case of the past-is-brown syndrome, and when we finally get a bright outdoor scene at the 1963 Newport Folk Festival, we sigh with relief. But what’s wrong with A Complete Unknown pales by comparison with what’s right with it, starting with Timothée Chalamet’s performance as Dylan. His impersonation of the young baby-faced Dylan is uncanny, and he catches the voice almost perfectly (though his vocals seemed less convincing during the closing credits sequence when we only heard them and didn’t see Chalamet’s utterly convincing visual performance as well). The script is also well constructed even though Dylan, like so many other artists, comes off as a heavy-duty asshole, casually having affairs with his girlfriend “Sylvie Russo” (Elle Fanning) – her real name was Suze Rotolo, and she was active in the civil-rights movement and supposedly introduced Dylan to Left-wing politics (though he’s already depicted as an admirer of Woody Guthrie, whom he visits in a hospital in New Jersey – Guthrie, who’s played in the movie by Scoot McNairy, suffered from Huntington’s disease and for the last years of his life lived in a hospital; his one source of joy was hearing aspiring singers like Dylan and Phil Ochs visit him and play his songs for him) while also pursuing an affair with Joan Baez. (The real Suze Rotolo refused permission to be depicted in the film, so Mangold and Cocks just called her something else – like the makers of the 1946 film The Jolson Story dealt with Jolson’s ex-wife Ruby Keeler’s refusal to let them depict her by calling her “Julie Benson.”)

I especially love the scene in which some of Dylan’s folkie friends find his scrapbooks from Minnesota, which “out” his real name, Robert Zimmerman. There’s a clipping in one of the scrapbooks advertising the “Winter Dance Party” tour of the Midwest in early 1959 featuring Buddy Holly, Ritchie Valens and The Big Bopper – all of whom were killed in a plane crash. When Dylan received his Lifetime Achievement Grammy Award in 1992 he mentioned having seen Holly on that tour, though he didn’t mention that the Holly show he caught had been his next-to-last one, just a day and a half before Holly died. Between that and Dylan’s professed admiration in his Minnesota days for Bobby Vee (who actually was one of the local artists invited to fill in on the next stop on the Winter Dance Party tour after Holly, Valens and the Bopper were killed, and went on to record an album with Holly’s backup band, The Crickets) – he actually went around town telling people he was Bobby Vee – the point of this story was he’d always been interested in rock ‘n’ roll and it shouldn’t have been such a shock when he bought an electric guitar and started playing rock in public. Also the many shots of Dylan riding a motorcycle, often appallingly recklessly, make a lot more sense if you know that a year after the 1965 Newport Folk Festival performance, Dylan was involved in a severe motorcycle crash that nearly killed him and incapacitated him for a year and a half. A Complete Unknown is a haunting movie, especially for people like me who were alive in the 1960’s and lived the history. My mother introduced me to Dylan when she bought his album The Times They Are a-Changing in the mid-1960’s, and when she first played the opening track I had one of my apocalyptic reactions to the effect that my world would never be the same again; that hearing this voice would be a life-changing experience. (I had the same feeling when I first heard Billie Holiday’s “I Cover the Waterfront,” David Bowie’s “Five Years,” Elvis Costello’s “Pump It Up,” and more recently when I first heard the amazing country voice of Rose Maddox – and if you’ve never heard of Rose Maddox, just look her up on archive.org or YouTube and see if you don’t react to that killer voice the way I did.)

It’s always a challenge for an actor to play someone who’s been filmed as much as the real people this movie is about, and Chalamet, Norton and Barbaro all rise to the challenge. In fact, this is the first movie of Chalamet’s I’ve really warmed to; I didn’t like his breakthrough movie Call Me by Your Name (2017), though not because of his performance but because Armie Hammer’s character was so obviously a sexual predator and Chalamet his victim. And though Chalamet did well enough as Paul Atreides in the two Dune movies (so far) directed by Denis Villeneuve, I’d always imagined Paul as more butch than that. But he’s near-perfect as Bob Dylan, and he moves through the movie with power and authority even though he seems at first to be almost terminally naïve. Mangold and Cocks keep it ambiguous whether Dylan actually wanted and sought out stardom or just stumbled in to it, and one thing about the real Dylan that comes through in the movie is his refusal to be pinned down, to change abruptly whenever people thought they had him categorized. No sooner had Pete Seeger and the people at Broadside and Sing Out! magazines proclaimed him as the successor to Guthrie and Seeger as the next great Left-wing “message” songwriter than he made an entire album of non-political songs and, to make sure people got the point, called it Another Side of Bob Dylan. Though Dylan hasn’t done the wrenching physical changes David Bowie did, he’s certainly gone through as many phases, including his bizarre embrace of born-again Christianity in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s and his more recent emergence as a crooner of 1920’s, 1930’s and 1940’s standards (at which he’s frankly terrible). But Bob Dylan remains a compelling figure in not only American but world culture (he was the first and so far only songwriter to win the Nobel Prize for Literature, though true to form he didn’t attend the ceremony), and this movie does his remarkable story – or at least the crucial four years of it from 1961 to 1965 – justice.

Double Indemnity (Paramount, 1944)


by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2024 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Two nights ago (Sunday, December 29) my husband Charles and I watched two films back-to-back on Turner Classic Movies: Billy Wilder’s film noir masterpiece Double Indemnity (1944) and Rex Ingram’s equally marvelous The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse (copyright 1920, released 1921). Watching Double Indemnity a night after TCM had shown The Postman Always Rings Twice was a revelation. Both films were based on novels by James M. Cain and both dealt with young, beautiful women married to much older men who seize on the intervention of young men from outside to be accomplices in knocking off their inconvenient husbands. Only Double Indemnity scored over Postman in every conceivable respect: the direction was by Billy Wilder, a major talent already totally assured even though it was only his third film (after The Major and the Minor and Five Graves to Cairo). He also co-wrote the script with Raymond Chandler, another major noir novelist – though, as Wilder told Charles Higham and Joel Greenberg for their book The Celluloid Muse, “I wanted to do the script with Cain himself, actually, but Cain was doing a Western at 20th Century-Fox, so Chandler seemed the best choice. It was, incidentally, the first time he had worked on a script, or been inside a studio.” I remember reading an article in the Los Angeles Times years ago from one of those annoying people who insist that, contrary to the auteur theory that holds the director is the true creative force behind a film, it’s really the writer who dominates. What got me angry about this article is that its author cited Raymond Chandler as a star writer on the basis of Double Indemnity and Murder, My Sweet (a classic film noir based on Chandler’s novel Farewell, My Lovely, though he had nothing to do with the screenplay by John Paxton), and I wrote a letter saying that one thing that irked me about the screenwriter-as-auteur people was they themselves ignore the original authors of the novels or plays that got turned into movies. I pointed out that Raymond Chandler hadn’t created the plot, characters or situations of Double Indemnity: James M. Cain had.

Anyway, Double Indemnity remains one of the greatest movies ever made, the perfect summing-up of Cain’s world on film the way the 1941 The Maltese Falcon is for Dashiell Hammett and Murder, My Sweet is for Chandler. The plot deals with insurance salesman Walter Neff (Fred MacMurray, who got the part after George Raft turned it down because he demanded a “lapel bit” – a revelation that his character was an undercover cop or FBI agent out to pin a murder rap on a femme fatale – way to go, George; you turned down High Sierra, The Maltese Falcon and this!), who stops at a nice house in Los Feliz to get Mr. Dietrichson (Tom Powers) to renew his auto insurance policy with the Pacific All-Risk company, for which Walter works. Mr. Dietrichson isn’t there, but his wife Phyllis (Barbara Stanwyck) is, and it’s lust at first sight between the two. Ultimately they hatch a plan by which Phyllis will take out an accident insurance policy on her husband and she and Walter will kill him together. The title “double indemnity” comes from a clause written in certain insurance policies to pay double the face amount for accidents that hardly ever happen – like a victim falling off a train and dying in the process. (Billy Wilder’s biographer, Maurice Zolotow, asked him if the insurance policy his wife had on him contained a double indemnity clause. It did not.) The plan comes off, though Walter is concerned about Phyllis’s choice of a witness to testify that Walter pitched her husband on an accident policy – her stepdaughter Lola (nicely played by Jean Heather) – and the presence of a witness on the train, Mr. Jackson (Porter Hall), who was out on the observation car as Walter, posing as Mr. Dietrichson, is just about to jump off around the spot where he and Phyllis have planted her husband’s body, since they’d actually killed him in his car before he even got on the train. But because Walter doesn’t want them to be seen together, he has them meet in the early 1940’s version of a supermarket (and since the film was shot during World War II, when food was rationed, the L. A. Police Department stationed four officers in the store to make sure the actors didn’t take anything home with them!), and the growing mistrust and hostility between them only gets worse when Lola tells Walter that she’s convinced Phyllis, who was the nurse taking care of her mother (Dietrichson’s first wife), actually murdered her and then married the widower. Ultimately there’s a blazing shoot-out between Walter and Phyllis at the Los Feliz house that ends with her dead and him badly wounded, though he lives long enough to tell the story in a voice-over narration ostensibly dictated on Dictaphone cylinders.

Also in the dramatis personae is Barton Keyes (Edward G. Robinson), a Javert-like claims examiner who’s trying to recruit Walter as his assistant and ultimately his replacement when he retires. Keyes intuits virtually the entire plot, but he pins it on the wrong man: Nino Zachetti (Byron Barr), Lola’s hot-headed boyfriend who becomes the boy-toy of Phyllis after she and Walter have conveniently dispatched her husband. In Wilder’s original ending, Walter was supposed to survive the shoot-out, get convicted of murdering the Dietrichsons and be executed in the gas chamber at San Quentin – and Billy Wilder, an opponent of capital punishment, took great pains to make the execution sequence look as brutal and gruesome as the real thing. But either someone at Paramount or the Production Code Administration decided that the execution scene was too much for audiences who’d already been taken on a wild sexual joyride pushing the limits of the Code. Wilder complained to Zolotow that audiences never got to see the two best scenes he ever filmed: the execution in Double Indemnity and the sequence he wanted to use to open Sunset Boulevard, in which the various corpses at the L.A. County morgue would start to talk to each other about how they died. (Wilder had to remove this scene after preview audiences laughed at it and found it ridiculous.) Instead Wilder and Chandler, with whom his relations had been testy at best, got back together and wrote a new ending that finishes this tough, hard-boiled story on a true note of pathos. Keyes confronts Walter just as he finishes his narration and Walter insists he’s going to escape to Mexico. “You won’t even make it to the elevator,” Keyes sardonically says. Walter collapses in the building hallway and as he expires Keyes gives him a cigarette, a running gag between them all movie. Walter tells Keyes he didn’t guess who Dietrichson’s murderer was because he was just in the next office from him, and Keyes says, “Closer than that,” as Walter expires. (In Cain’s original novel, the equivalent characters – the insurance salesman was Walter Huff and the victim was named Nirdlinger – do escape on a steamship bound for Mexico, but out of guilt feelings about what they’ve done commit joint suicide by throwing themselves overboard.)

Though the rewrite introduced a continuity glitch – Walter’s wounds from the gun battle with Phyllis don’t look serious enough to be life-threatening, and in the original script they weren’t – it also is a marvelously sardonic and at the same time strangely moving way to end an already remarkable film. As far as the acting is concerned, there’s no contest between Double Indemnity and The Postman Always Rings Twice: Barbara Stanwyck is the ultimate femme fatale, wearing a blonde wig in the style of Marlene Dietrich’s hairdo in the 1941 film Manpower and acting with her usual power and authority. (By comparison, Lana Turner in Postman looks like a barely animate sex doll.) Fred MacMurray, who’d never played a villainous role before (though he would do so three more times, in The Caine Mutiny, Pushover – a reworking of Double Indemnity in which he played, not a corrupted insurance salesman, but a corrupted cop – and for Wilder again in The Apartment, after which a woman came up to him when he was in Disneyland with his wife and kids, and said, “You should be ashamed of yourself for almost driving that nice Shirley MacLaine to suicide!” After that he swore that he would only play lovable roles in comedies from then on), is absolutely first-rate. So is Edward G. Robinson as essentially the voice of reason in this dark tale. In his autobiography, Robinson told the story of how he almost didn’t get this part. He ran into Billy Wilder at a Hollywood party, and Wilder said he’d offered him a part in a film called Double Indemnity but hadn’t heard back from him. Robinson had never heard of Double Indemnity, let alone been aware that he was being offered a role in it. The next day he called his agent, who told him that he hadn’t bothered to send him the script because he’d only be billed third. Robinson demanded to see the script, it was messengered over to him that afternoon, and he read it overnight and loved it. The next morning he called his agent and said, “I don’t care if I’m billed tenth! The next time you get a script that good for me, I want to see it!Double Indemnity remains a great movie, far, far superior to Postman as a filmization of James M. Cain’s sexually and morally sordid world and one of Wilder’s best movies, along with The Lost Weekend, Sunset Boulevard and what’s probably his best film, the woefully underrated Ace in the Hole a.k.a. The Big Carnival.