Thursday, March 30, 2023

Woodstock (Wadleigh-Maurice Films, Warner Bros., 1970)

by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2023 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Last night (March 29) at 8:30 p.m. Turner Classic Movies ran the film Woodstock as part of a night of Academy Award-winning or -nominated documentaries. Woodstock was the film released in 1970 by Warner Brothers based on the three-day “Peace and Music” festival held at Bethel, New York – after two other upstate New York towns, Woodstock and Wallkill, had refused permission – on August 15-18, 1969. (The festival was scheduled for three one-day concerts on Friday, August 15; Saturday, August 16; and Sunday, August 17; but the performnances were so long the last night extended to the early morning of the 18th and Jimi Hendrix performed his legendary set in the first light of Monday morning.) I remember seeing a PBS documentary on Woodstock from 2019 (reviewed on moviemagg at https://moviemagg.blogspot.com/2019/08/by-time-we-got-to-woodstock.html) released to coincide with the 50th anniversary of the festival, which detailed the struggles the four promoters – Michael lang, John Rosenman, John Roberts and Artie Kornfeld – went through to build a talent roster for the festival and secure a site. Their original objective was to raise money to build a recording studio in the Woodstock area, wish had already been put on the map by Bob Dyylan and The Band (separately and together). The idea morphed from building a recording studio to holding a series of concerts to raise money for the studio project, and finally to one mega-concert to be held over three days.

Because it took the promoters so long to nail down a site, they weren’t able to build both the fencing to keep people who hadn’t bought tickets (which were quite reasonably priced; they cost $7 per day or $18 for a three-day pass, equivalent to $54 for the one-day ticket or $120 for the three-day pass in 2019 dollars) and a stage for the performers. So they chose to build the stage and the accompanying light towers (which got scaled by some of the concertgoers, much to the consternation of the promoters, who were worried the extra weight would cause the towers to topple and possibly kill or injure audience members;lduring the concert various people took to the mikes to plead with the tower-scalers to come down) because they were worried about being sued for false advertising if they couldn’t present the musical acts they’d promised. That meant that they never finished the fencing – the film includes shots of audience members gleefully walking over the bits of fencing previous indeed had trampled – and eventually the promoters gave up on collecting ticket revenue and declared it a free festival. Ironically, the success of the movie, the accompanying soundtrack LP (there were actually two, a three-LP set marketed in 1970 and a two-LP compilation called Woodstock Two a year later) and sales of merchandise (including the festival’s iconic logo, a dove perching on the neck of a guitar) ultimately bailed them out and enabled the promoters to turn a small profit on the event.

As I argued in my post on the 2019 PBS documentary, “Woodstock” became a carefully constructed and nurtured legend to promote movie tickets and album sales, though it also became a touchstone for a generation. The version of the movie TCM showed was the so-called “Director’s Cut,” released in 1994 to coincide with the 25th anniversary of the festival, which added extra performances, including some by at least two acts, the Jefferson Airplane and Janis Joplin, who hadn’t been shown in the original 1970 release. The Wodostock performances have be3en released in various audio formats over the yeaqrs,a nd my reference copy was a three-CD set issued in2019 to commemorate (and take advantage of) the 50th anniversary). It doesn’t iinclude any of Jimi Hendrix’s magnificent and iconic set (he closed the fe3stival and since his death there have ben so many posthumous moves of his record contract the original company no longer owned the rights to his material), but it did include bands who weren’t in either version of the film, including The Band, Credence Clearwater Revival and Blood, Sweat and Tears. Oddly, the Jefferson Airplane are represented in the 1994 version only by tw o relatively lame songs, “Won’t You Try” and a versionof Oran “Hot Lips” Page’s 1944 “Uncle Sam’s Blues” with updated lyrics, while on the 2019 CD’s they were represented by searing performances of two of their biggest hits, “Somebody to Love”and “Volunteers.”

On the other hand, Janis Joplin – whose biographers have noted how terribly she felt she had performed at Woodstock., to the point that no footage of her appeared in the 1970 version of the film (released while she was still alive and therefore able to stop it) – appeared on the CD’s sin perofmrnaces of “Kozmik Blues” and “Piece of My Heart” that soundbite as lame as she’d always said the set was. In the 1994 film, however, she’s represented by a great performance, Nick Gravenites’ “Work Me, Lord.” (Gravenites was a white Chicago blues singer who replaced Janis in her original band, Big Brother and the Holding Company, on the grounds that if they’d hired another woman she’d just have had to face invidious comparisons) Coming in the 1994 version right after Sly and the Family Stone’s iconic performance of “I Want to Take You Higher,” in which Sly and the band exhort the audience to flash the peace sign and sing along with the song’s catch word, “Higher,” Janis’s impassioned rendition of Gravenites’ openly religious song emphasizes how all blu9es, rock and soul music is rooted in the Black church. Woodstock the movie, in either form, is a cultural artifact of a generation that made its mark on the world for both good and ill; as I noted in my commentary on the 2019 PBS documentary, ever since the 1960’s the American right in general and the Republican Party in particular have defined themselves in opposition to the racial, gender and cultural liberation that the 1960’s and the so-called “Woodstock Generation” represented.

Certainly my own perceptions of some of the Woodstock performances have changed over the years even while others have remained pretty much the same. I still don’t care for Joe Cocker’s slowed-down version of The Beatles’ “With a Little Help from My Friends” – when I first saw the movie I thought, “Another white guy who thinks he’s Ray Charles,” and when Cocker sang the line, “:Lend me your ears and I’ll sing you a song,and I’ll try not to sing out of key,” my husband Charles joked, “Try harder.’ – but I’ve made my peace with it a bit more than I did then. (It helped that at least two members of Cocker’s band – keyboard player Leon Russell and backup singer Rita Coolidge – later became stars on their own, and Russell’s superb organ playing gives this song most of what power it has.) Some of the homages to 1950’s rock ‘n’ roll – not only Sha Na Na’s cover of Danny and the Juniors’ 1958 hit “At the Hop” (of which the original Rolling Stone reviewer of the soundtrack album said that leaving it off would have made the album two minutes shorter, “but otherwise would not have affected it in any way”) but The Who’s “Summertime Blues” (I got to know this song from the heavy-metal versions by Blue Cheer and The Who, and so I was startled when in the late 1970’s I finally heard the original by Eddie Cochran and noted it was driven by acoustic guitar and was far more infectious than those elephantine 1960’s covers) and the knockoffs of both Black and white blues and rock songs in Ten Years After’s almost interminable “I’m Goin’ Home” – date pretty badly. But then there are a lot of records I really liked in the 1960’s’ and 1970’s that don’t sound as good as the artists were ripping off.

On the other hand, I like Santana’s hot instrumental “Soul Sacrifice” quite a lot better than I did then; when I first saw the Woodstock movie I thought it was just noise, but I’ve grown to appreciate Carlos Santana’s killer guitar and the interplay between him and the rest of the band. And the Hendrix set – bolstered in 1994 by the insertion of “Voodoo Child (Slight Return)” in the “director's cut” – remaini amazing, a testament not only to Hendrix’s genius as an improviser (however much he owed to previous Black singer-guitarists like Aaron “T-Bone” Walker, from whom he learned how to play guitar behind his back and pick it with his teeth) but to Wadleigh’s skill as a filmmaker that he keeps his camera on Hendrix front and center and for the most part avoids the annoying cutaways other directors who filmed Hendrix indulged in so our attention was taken away from what we really wanted to see: his fingers on his guitar producing those amazing sounds. The name of the group Jimi Hendrix performed with was "Band of Gypsys, Suns and Rainbows," later shortened to just "Band of Gypsys" [sic]. The band featured conga player Juma Sultan, who had also played with jazz legend John Coltrane on his final concert on April 23, 1967, three months before Coltrane's death on July 17, 1967. Juma Sultan is the only musician who recorded with both Coltrane and Hendrix. The film’s ending is a bit sad – we hear Hendriz playing a jam but most of what we see takes place after he’s finished and attendees are responding to calls from the stage to start the seemingly impossible task of cleaning up – but then that’s a sign of human nature that you can’t dump a whole bunch of people on a farm for three days and not expect them to leave a giant mess behind, no matter how well they got along during the event.

Tuesday, March 28, 2023

The Last Emperor (Yanco Films Limited, TAO Fil, Recorded Picture Company, Screenframe, AAA SoproFilms, HanWay Films, Columbia, 1987)

by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2023 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Last Saturday night, March 25, after my husband Charles and I watched the 1970 World War II biopic Patton, I had planned to switch from TCM to the Lifetime channel to watch a new “premiere” movie called Every Breath She Takes – yet another knock-off of Sleeping with the Enemy in which an abused wife whose husband presumably died in a fire in their home seems to be alive and stalking her, while the police investigate whether she deliberately set the fire that presumably killed him – but my husband Charles had other ideas.(The Lifetime movie is being reshown this Saturday at 6 p.m. just before the network’s latest “premiere,” Stalked by Her Past.) He wanted me to stay on TCM to watch the 1987 biopic The Last Emperor, a multi-Academy Award-winning film (it was nominated for nine awards and won all of them, including Best Picture) which, much to my surprise, Charles insisted he’d never seen before. During its theatrical release Charles was living with his mother in Grass Valley,California, a remote old mining town that had only one movie theatre, run by a quirky film buff who would get interesting foreign films as well as U.S. releases. Alas, the week he was scheduled to show The Last Emperor there was an accident with the print; it unspooled itself and the owner announced it would take about an hour or so to get it s howable again, so instead he told everyone to come back and see a different movie the next week for free. I first saw the film on VHS tape, which I got from the Columbia House (I believe), and I’m surprised I never ran it for Charles during the years it sat in my collection.

The Last Emperor was the story of Pu Yi (played by four different actors: Richard Vuu at age three, Tijger Tsou at eight, Wu Tao at 15 and the film’s star, John Lone, as an adult), wh o at age six was proclaimed by the Empress Dowager as tne new Emperor of China just before her own death in 1908. It was directed by BErnardo Bertolucci, who had a penchant for stories about people trapped in the political, social or sexual intrigues of their times, and was written by Mark Peoloe, with an assist from Bertolucci himself, based on Pu Yi’s autobiography, From Emperor to Citizen, with an initial draft by Enzo Ungari. This time around I was amazed by the two aspects of the movie that had impressed me the first time around: the wretched absurdity of Pu Yi’s life at court in the Forbidden City of Beijing (then called Peking, based on a different transliteration of the Chinese name) and the most controversial part of Pu Yi’s life, his acceptance of the throne of Pu Yi’s native Manchuria, which the Japanese renamed “Manchukuo,” albeit as just a puppet controlled by the Japanese occupiers. Pu Yi’s life at court is a bizarre series of rituals in which everybody around him has to pretend that this boy, who just likes to play with his older brother and do boy-like things, is the divinely inspired ruler of China and has to be worshiped as practically a god on earth. (One wonders if Romulus Agustulus, the four-year-old who briefly sat on the throne of the Western Roman Empire before its final fall at the hands of invading Germans, went through the same thing.)

To give the young Pu Yi the education he would need to fulfill his duties as Emperor when he reached adulthood, the court hires a British tutor, Reginald Johnson (Peter O’Toole, who since his star-making turn in Lawrence of Arabia 25 years before had been expert at playing well-meaning Brits screwing up Third World countries). Meanwhile, the Manchu Dynasty finally falls in 1911 and China becomes a rep;ublilc; Johnson explains to Pu Yi that within the walls of the Forbidden City, which he is no longer allowed to leave, he’s still an emperor; but outside int he rest of China he’s just another man and China is now ruled not by an emperor but a president. When the republican government of China finally decides to stop spending the insane amount of money it takes to maintain the zombie court in the Forbidden City and its residents, including its eunuchs, Pu Yi drifts into a playboy-like existence. We see him hanging out in dance clubs and ballrooms where, in one of the marvelous uses of music in this film, a jazz band is playing the rancidly racist song “China Boy.” (The lyrics are so bad – they start, “China boy, go sleep,” and go downhill from there – that of all the versions I have of this song, only one, Louis Prima’s, isn’t an instrumental.)

Pu Yi’s wife, Wan Jung (Joan Chen), tries to warn him about his increasing infatuation with the Japanese, but he doesn’t take her seriously because he’s lost interest in her due to her opium addiction (Pu Yi is especially anti-drug since opium killed his mother) and her interest in alternative sex partners, both men and women. She’s shown in a bizarre scene of kissing feet with one of her girlfriends, and at the same time she has an affair with the family chauffeur, Chang (Cary Hiroyuki Tagawa). She gets pregnant by Chang and announces to Pu Yi that he’s gong to have an heir, but the Japanese running his government tell him the baby is not his and the kid is born dead anyway. Pu Yi is recruited to the Japanese cause, at le3ast according to the script of this film, becuasehe’s told that the Nationalists who took over china when the Empire fell have desecrated the Mongolian tombs of his ancestors, and he also seems to believe the Japanese want him as an actual governing partner and not just a figthrehea. The film is structured in a series of flashbacks from 1950, when Pu Yi has been arrested by Soviet forces in China and turned over to Mao Zedong’s new Communist Chinese government for a long prison sentence during which he’s subjected to what the Communists call “re-education” and the rest of the world labeled “brainwashing.” He’s finally released in 1959 and spends the rest of his life working – literally – as a gardener, though a year before his death in 1967 he sees his old prison camp commander being dragged throught hestreets and forced to wear a dunce cap on his head by the Red Guards, young thugs who were mobilized by Communist leader Mao Zedong as part of his late-1970’s “Cultural Revolution.” In vain he protests that he knows this man and he’s a good man that doesn’t deserve his public humiliation, only to be pushed away and his own position jeopardized.

The Last Emperor was the first time a Western film company was allowed to shoot in China since the Communists won the Chinese civil war in 1949, though this also meant the Chinese government had approval rights over the script. In the end they passed it with only minor changes, and it’s possible that at the time the film was made, the current Chinese leader was Deng Xiaoping, who had condemned Mao’s widow and the other members for the so-called “Gang of Four” and turned China from an egalitarian (albeit repressive) Communist country into a giant sweatshop for the world’s capitalists. Doubtless Deng didn’t mind a project that made Mao’s people and his era look bad. I quite liked The Last Emperor both the first time I saw it and now; it’s an example of good historical dramatization, and though one can imagine more subtleties in Pu Yi’s character that didn’t get depicted, John Lone’s outrage at the way the Japanese are treating him and how he isn’t fulfilling h is long-awaited destiny to be a real emperor in his role as the Japanese puppet ruler of “Manchukuo” is utterly convincing, as is his naïveté at ever believing the Japanese were going to treat him any other way.And it did strike me as interesting that within two days Charles and I had seen three films – The Great Dictator, Patton and The Last Emperor – that dealt, ini profoundly different ways, with World War II.

Monday, March 27, 2023

Home, Not Alone (Hybrid, Lifetime, 2023)


by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2023 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Last night (March 26) my husband Charles and I watched a pretty ordinary Lifetime movie called Home. Not Alone – a title considerably more creative than anything in the actual film, written by Jeffrey Schenck, Peter Sullivan and Adam Rockoff (all old Lifetime hands) and directed by Amy Barrett (so once again you have a Lifetime film directed by a woman but written by a man – in this case by three men, with Schenck and Sullivan supplying the “original” story and Rockoff the script). It’s basically a compendium of Lifetime clichés based on the idea that a man who’s lost his family home (his ancestral home, it turns out, since his grandfather built it during Prohibition and equipped it with a speakeasy in the basement, and his family had lived there until they lost the place through foreclosure, though unless he’d taken out a home equity loan, there’s no reason there should be a mortgage on the place and a continued need to make house payments) simply refuses to leave. Instead he creates a hideout within the house and bedevils the new owners, Sara Wilson (Andrea Bogart) and her 18-year-old daughter Jordyn (Maya Jenson) – at least that’s how the name is spelled on the film’s imdb.com page. Sara moved herself and Jordyn across the country – it’s unclear from the writing committee where they started from but it’s all too clear the house of doom is in Santa Barbara – to get away from her abusive ex-husband Frank (Elijah Majar), who wants to have a relationship with Jordyn which Jordyn is totally uninterested in resuming.

The one even remotely creative thing the writers did with this one was to have Colin Murray (Adam Huss, not bad-looking but not drop-dead gorgeous either), the man who lost the house through foreclosure and is secretly living inside, also date Sara Wilson and come close to seducing her, though their relationship doesn’t quite make it to the bedroom. Colin claims to be a building contractor and to have a place of his own, though he says he’s too embarrassed by it to invite Sara there. He gives her a business card and tells her to call him if there’s anything wrong with the house, and she hears odd noises which Colin at first says were pests which he says he can get rid of. The audience learns that Colin is Sara’s and Jordyn’s mystery stalker well before Sara realizes that herself. Jordyn has a boyfriend of her own, Noah Ryan (Luke Meissner, who’s drop-dead gorgeous and has great pecs; he did a lot more for me than the twink types that usually get these sorts of roles in Lifetime movies). There are a few Lifetime clichés Schenck, Sullivan and Rockoff avoided – when the house turned out to be split-level and there was a long flight of stairs between them, I immediately assumed the writers were going to have someone either fall or be pushed down those stairs, and it didn’t happen. Nor did they have the scapegrace villain Colin knock off Frank Wilson, something they’ve pulled on previous Lifetime movies as well as in the mainstream film Sling Blade, which I remember resenting for suggesting that there’s no way a woman can get out of an abusive relationship with a man besides having the town psycho knock him off for her.

But they eagerly embraced the Lifetime cliché of the heroine’s African-American best friend – here Sara’s co-worker Lucy (Alicia S. Mason) – who learns of the villain’s dastardly plan but is foiled and put out of commission before she can warn the heroine. At least this time Colin only clobbers her with a frying pan and she survives, albeit stuffed in a secret closet that was one of the old 1920’s hideaways built into the house to foil Prohibition agents. This film also suffers from what I call the Lured trap – the unconscionably long time it takes for the heroine to learn that her principal associate is the villain who’s making her life miserable. I call it the Lured trap after the marvelous 1947 film noir Lured, which starred George Sanders as a London theatrical impresario and Lucille Ball as the chorus girl who’s used by Scotland Yard to lure a serial killer who preys on young attractive women after sending them notes of doggerel inspired by Beaudelaire. It’s a great movies and one of the astounding examples of how good an actress Lucille Ball could be in serious dramatic roles (as are Dance, Girl, Dance, The Big Street, DuBarry Was a Lady and the 1949 Easy Living); her talents were far broader than you’d think if you just know her from her TV work. But what I call the “Lured trap” occurs at the end, when Sanders’ character is arrested for the killings because the notes were typed on his typewriter – and he never stops to think that his roommate, the only other person with access to that typewriter, could be the killer. In Home, Not Alone Sara likewise never stops to suspect that Colin could be her mystery stalker – and even Jordyn, who doesn’t like him (at one point, in Sara’s momentary absence, he took Jordyn aside and literally accused her of disrespecting the house and being morally unfit to live in it) and finds the thought of her mother having an affair with this creep gross, never suspects him either.

He’s only “outed” when the Black police detective investigating Sara’s reports finds his secret hiding place within the house, including a snow globe containing the text of the Eighteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which Sara had given Colin as a novelty item. Eventually the police arrest Colin, but there was one more act still to go, and I guessed correctly that it would involve the creepy woman realtor, Kendall Jones (Jamie Bernadette). She had arranged for an out-of-town buyer to take the house off the Wilsons’ hands and give them a 20 percent profit, but once Colin is in custody the Wilsons decide not to sell – and Kendall goes berserk at that news. It turns out she was the so-called “out-of-town buyer” and she wanted the house back because a large corporation was planning to build a huge campus for its workers and the property the house was on was going to be its centerpiece. In the end Kendall gets drowned by Sara in self-defense as the two wrestle for Kendall’s knife in the house’s indoor swimming pool (a set I remember from at least one previous Lifetime movie) and she and Jordyn end up in a new, equally nice house. Home, Not Alone was a movie all too predictable, at least if you’ve seen more than about three or four Lifetime movies im your own lifetime, and it delivered the goods but nothing more – though I wondered about the possibilities for a sequel in which it turns out Colin and Sara did have sex together, he got her pregnant, and when he either is released or escapes from prison comes looking for her to get their baby back.

Orphan Black: "Natural Selection" (Bell Media,BBC America, Temple Street Productions, 2013)

by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2023 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

After Home, Not Alone I eventually ended up watching the opening episode, “Natural Selection,” of a TV series produced by BBC America for the Canadian market called Orphan Black. PBS acquired the U.S. rights to this rather odd show, which ran for 50 episodes between 2013 and 2017, and gave it a major promotional “push” with lots of trailers suggesting a cross between a policier and a science-ficton story.It opens with an apparent suicide in a subway in which a young woman named Elizabeth (Tamara Maslany) apparently commits suicide by hurling herself in the path of an oncoming train. Sarah Manning (also Tamara Maslany) happens upon the scene and decides to impersonate Elizabeth and get her hands on her fortune, which turns out to be $70,000 in a recently opened bank account and also a bag full of cocaine. Sarah has a former foster brother, Felix Dawkins (Jordan Gavanis), who appears to be Gay – he cruises a doctor named Colin (Nicholas Rose) who was treating him for a minor injury, and later he puts on a dress during an argument with his roommate Vic (Michael Mando) over Sarah’s stash of cocaine. There’s a great scene in a bar in which, as in all too many real-life bars, the music is so loud you can’t hear what the people in the bar are actually saying to each other. Sarah also meets with Elizabeth’s boyfriend Paul Dierden (Dylan Bruce), who wonders just why “Elizabeth” is so much more sexually aggressive than he remembers her.

Towards the end of this show, Sarah is accosted by yet another woman who strikingly resembles her, Katja Obringer (I hate to do this to you, but you know who plays her? That’s right, Tamara Maslany again!), only as soon as Katja gets into Sarah’s car she’s shot and killed by an unseen assailant who shoots a rifle through the windshield of Sarah’s car, and Sarah has to duck down and drive as best she can to avoid being killed herself by the same gunman. Though the writers, Graeme Mason and John Fawcett (the two are credited with creating the show and Mason with writing this particular episode), don’t come right out and say it in this polit show, in later episodes it turns out that Elizabeth, Sarah and Katja were among 50 or so clones created by super-secret research lab for some sinister purpose, and either the agency that created them in the first place or some other sinister group has marked them all for destruction and is killing them one by one.

Orphan Black seems from this first encounter to be a shoe that’s almost too self-consciously edgy for its own good, but it could be interesting over the long haul and I’m not sure whether or not I want to make the commitment to follow it in an ongoing way. In fact, that’s one thing I hate about serialized TV dramas in general: the sense that the producers are asking you to make a long-term commitment to their show and are effectively demanding that you watch all their episodes or none –and generally, given that choice, I end up watching none. It’s also not clear just where the show takes place – Britain, Canada or the United States – though I”m guessing the setting is American since most (though not all) the actors speak with American rather than British accents, the money Sarah is misappropriating is denominated in dollars (not pounds.: though Canada’s currency is also called the dollar, it’s not worth the same as the U.S. dollar), and the cars have their steering wheels on the left-hand side.

Sunday, March 26, 2023

Patton (20th Century-Fox, 1970)

by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2023 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Last night (March 25) Turner Classic Movies did a salute to Academy Award-winning or -nominated biopics as part of their “31 Days of Oscar” celebration, and I watched two of them: Patton (1970) and The Last Emperor (1987). Patton was one of 20th Century-Fox’s cycle of mega-films about World War II, starting with The Longest Day (1962), about the D-Day invasion of France on June 6, 1944, and continuing through to this one and Tora! Tora! Tora! (also 1970), about the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. This time 20th Century-Fox studio head Richard Zanuck (son of Darryl F. Zanuck,who had led Fox for years since the merger that created the awkwardly titled studio in 1936), producer Frank McCarthy and director Franklin J. Schaffner (which sounds more like the name of a banker than a filmmaker) decided to focus on the European theatre and in particular the larger-than-life character of General George S. Patton, Jr., played in a remarkable tour de force performance by George C. Scott. The script was by two highly talented writers, Francis Ford Coppola and Edmund H. North (the latter an odd name to see on a war film since his best-known credit is the openly pacifist 1951 The Day the Earth Stood Still, though his résumé lists other 1960’s pro-war films like Sink the Bismarck!, Damn the Defiant! and Submarine X-1), and I remember being a bit perplexed at the time that Coppola wasn’t hired to direct it as well. Schaffner delivers a competent, workmanlike job that basically consists of pointing the cameras at George C. Scott and getting (and staying) out of his way.

One aspect of Patton that bothered me when it was new – I saw it on its initial theatrical release but hadn’t seen it since until last night – was Jerry Goldsmith’s musical score, full of trumpet voluntaries run through echo machines, though I found it interesting this time that Schaffner left most of the actual battle scenes unscored. To me that made them more powerful than they would have been if there’d been a thundering Max Steiner-esque score under them. Patton was made at an ideologically fraught time, in which the Viet Nam war was still going on and some critics made invidious comparisons between Patton’s fabled aggressiveness and what seemed like the relative timidity of the U.S. commanders in Viet Nam. It was definitely a film for “hawks,” though my mother told me that as much as she reviled war in general and the Viet Nam war in particular, if the Earth were ever invaded by aliens from outer space she would want there to be a man like Pqatton to lead Earth’s resistance. Patton begins with George C. Scott standing in front of a huge American flag delivering a speech actually spoken by the real General Patton – the one ion which he said, “No poor bastard ever won a war by dying for their country. You win a war by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country.” Origiinally this scene had been planned to come just after the intermission, but producer McCarthy and director Schaffner decided to use ot to open the film – much to the discontent of George C. Scott, who thought that if the film began with such a powerful and iconic moment the rest of his performance would suffer by comparison. (He needn’t have worried.)

What’s most striking about Patton today is the portrayal of the ego contests between the Allied generals, particularly the British commander Sir Bernard Lee Montgomery (Michael Bates). Through much of the film, Patton seems more concerned with beating Montgomery to key strategic locations than he is with fighting the Germans. Patton himself comes through as a super-dedicated military man, a student of military history – in one of the film’s most famous scenes he insists on driving out to a battlefield in Morocco, much to the consternation of his drive (Bill Hickman)r, who knows full well that the real battle Patton just fought was nowhere near there. Patton explains that he wants to visit the site of one of the key battles in Rome’s defeat of Carthage during the Third Punic War. Throughout the movie Patton speaks of classic historical battles and says, “I was there” – though it’s unclear whether he literally believes in reincarnation or just that he’s read so much about these battles it feels like he was there. Patton’s live of military history is a Leitmotif throughout the film – at one point during the planning for D-Day he urges his fellow Allied commanders to use the plan General Heinirich von Schlieffen devised to conquer France during World War I – as is his recitation of Romantic-sounding poetry it turns out he’s written himself.

The fabled incident in which Patton slaps an American soldier (Tim Considine) because he’s told the medical department he just can’t take the strain of combat anymore is in the movie, though one piece of Pattoniana – his mounting an elaborate and time-consuming (and ultimately failed) attack on a German P.O.W. camp to free his son-in-law – isn’t in the film and I only found out about ot a couple of years ago from a YouTube video. One of the best parts of the Coppola-North script is the periodic inserts of scenes set in the German high command camp, in which Field Marshal Erwin Rommel (Karl Michael Vogler) and his staff – including First Lieutenant Alexander Stiller (Patrick J. Zunca), whom Rommel assigns to study Patton and who essentially becomes Rommel’s “Patton whisperer” discuss the Allied commanders, especially the scene in which the Germans literally can’t believe the Allies would have sidelined their best general just for slapping an enlisted man.

Patton is depicted as a premature Cold Warrior, anxious to attack the Russians “now, while we have the Army here” rather than wait for the war against Germany and Japan to end. In a chillingly prophetic scene he talks about how he’s shocked by the German “wonder weapons,” including drones, and says they would take all the glory, honor and nobility out of war. Through much of the movie I kept flashing back to Scott’s performance as the maniac general Buck Turgidson in Dr. Strangelove six years earlier – at times Patton seems like a prequel to Strangelove – and Patton’s still mysterious death in an auto accident in postwar Germany on December 9, 1945 (Patton was severely injured and died 12 days later) seems like an odd sort of blessing since he could no longer do the one thing on earth he could do well, which was fight and lead men into combat. George C. Scott played Patton again ini a 1987 TV-movie about his death called The Last Days of Patton.

Saturday, March 25, 2023

The Great Dictator (Charles Chaplin Productions, United Artists, Roy Export Corporation, 1940)

by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2023 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Yesterday (March 24) at 9 p.m. my husband Charles and I watched a Turner Classic Movies “31 Days of Oscar” showing of Charlie Chaplin’s 1940 satire The Great Dictator. It was Chaplin’s first all-talkie (his immediately preceding film, 1936’s Modern Times – a stunning masterpiece and my personal favorite Chaplin film – had contained a few sequences of voices heard commanding factory workers over intercoms and a final song-and-dance routine by Chaplin, but was otherwise still silent), and it was a film built around Chaplin’s striking resemblance to Adolf Hitler. Chaplin, who as usual wrote, produced, directed and starred in the film, used the Rip Van Winkle gimmick of a Jewish barber who fights for his native country, Tomania, during World War I. He and Schultz (Reginald Gardiner) are involved in a plane crash, and Schulktz fully recovers but Chaplin’s character ends up in a military hospital for 20 years, unaware of the cataclysmic changes in the world since then: the Armistice, the peace treaty, the Depression and the ascendancy of “Adenoid Hynkel, the Fuhi of Tomania” to power. He comes into conflict with the New Order almost immediately when he sees a storm trooper vandalizing the outside of his barbershop with the word “JEW” and starts to wipe it off.

Chaplin builds his film by cutting back and forth between himself as the barber (who still has some of the characteristics of the “Little Tramp,” including the bowler hat, the rattan cane and the jacket a size too small for him) and himself as “Hynkel,” whom he portrays as the ethnic stereotype of the comic German. His two big pantomime sequences occur right after each other, as “Hynkel” does an elaborate dance with a balloon globe as he fantasizes being dictator of the world and the soundtrack plays the prelude to act I of Wagner’s Lohengrin; and Chaplin as the barber shaving his old Keystone colleague Chester Conklin to a radio broadcast of Brahms’ most famous Hungarian dance. (I can’t help but think Chaplin was deliberately referencing the Wagner-vs.-Brahms rivalry that gripped the German music scene in the late 19th century as well as Hitler’s well-known love of Wagner in this juxtaposition – Wagner as the composer for the bad people and Brahms as the composer for the good people – except that at the end of the film he reprises the Lohengrin prelude with his final shot of Paulette Goddard as Hannah defying the storm troopers and standing triumphant.)

The Great Dictator is a remarkable movie which apparently was controversial when it was made – Chaplin, who had never naturalized as an American citizen (and when asked why not during the McCarthy era he gave a very politically incorrect reply: “I consider myself a citizen of the entire world; I owe no allegiance to any particular country”) and was still a subject of the British crown, was accused of making an anti-Hitler movie as propaganda to get the U.S. to enter World War II on the British side. Though The Great Dictator was a commercial success on its initial release, the political attack on it started the unraveling of Chaplin’s standing as a major movie star and ultimately his expulsion from the U.S. in 1953. My mother told me an interesting story about seeing The Great Dictator on its initial release, when she was a 12-year-old Jewish girl in the U.S. Until then, instead of fearing a fictitious “boogeyman” taking her in the middle of the night and killing her, she was afraid of a very real boogeyman, Adolf Hitler. Then she saw The Great Dictator and suddenly she was no longer afraid of Hitler personally; he was just someone she could laugh at. In Chaplin’s 1965 autobiography he said he could not have made The Great Dictator if he’d known about the Holocaust – though in fact the Holocaust was not yet happening when Chaplin shot the film. The Nazis were certainly persecuting the Jews, but it wasn’t until the Wannsee conference of January 1942 (which Hitler authorized but did not attend personally) that the Nazis decided to kill them all. And in Garson Kanin’s autobiography Hollywood he recalled asking Chaplin why, when he played his parody Hitler, he kept his hair tousled on top of his head and didn’t comb it over his forehead the way the real Hitler did, “Why should I?” Chaplin replied, “I was using this makeup before he was!”

I’ve loved The Great Dictator since I first saw it in 1974 at a revival theatre in Berkeley, and I’ve come to accept and enjoy even aspects of the film that bothered me back then, like the portrayal of the storm troopers as Keystone Kops and the big final speech at the end, in which Chaplin as the Jewish barber is forced to impersonate “Hynkel” at the big rally celebrating Tomania’s conquest of neighboring “Austerlitz.” His final speech – shot straight ahed with Chaplin declaiming to the camera (Chaplin came to sound films a decade late and want through all the growing pains the rest of the industry had in the late 1920’s) – begins in a quiet, soft-spoken manner but soon rises in energy and volume to become a full-fledged Hitler-style tirade, albeit on the opposite political and ideological direction. I’ve long thought Chaplin had seen the power of Hither’s oratory and rhetoric and wanted to see if he could harness it for exactly the opposite purpose – a call for peace and democracy instead of war and authoritarianism – creating himslef as a “good Hitler” in opposition to the real-life bad Hitler.

The Great Dictator is also an unusually strongly cast Chaplin film,with Henry Daniell marvelous as “Garbitsch,” the great dictator’s propaganda minister (his performance seems like a warmup for his star turn as Professor Moriarty in the Sherlock Holmes film The Woman in Green five years later); Billy Gilbert for once making his years playing stereotypical comic Germans pay off as “Herring,” minister of war; and Jack Oakie great in an OIscar-nominated performance as “Benzino Napaloni, Il Diggaditchi of Bacteria.” It’s a film that holds up surprisingly well, especially in the modern era in which once again wana-be authoritarians are parading before electorates in various countries pleading for votes so they can come to power and destroy democracy once and for all. When I wrote about Dunald Trump’s acceptance speech at the 2916 Republican Convention. I invoked comparisons to this film, saying that Trump was presenting himself as Adolf Hitler but – especially in his queeny hand gestores whenever he wanted his audience to stop applauding so he could continue his speech – he reminded me even more of Chaplin’s “Adenoid Hynkel.”

Law and Order:"Deadline" (Dick Wolf Entertainment, Universal Television, NBC-TV, aired March 23, 2023)

by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2023 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Two nights ago (March 23) NBC finally re-started the Thursday night marathon of Law and Order programs, starting with an episode of the flagship Law and Order program, "Dead;ine," that was quite well done and compelling. It dealt with them ruder of Jewish-American journalist Jacob Ackerman (Alex Michael Shafer) after a neo-Nazi wanna-be named Lucas Hobbs (Forrest Weber) spray-painted the word “JEW” on the outside of Ackerman’s building. Jacob goes out to investigate the spray-painting and is confronted by a person whom we don’t see, and he later ends up dead with two stab wounds to the chest. The police arrest Hobbs but he has an alibi, and they arrest him for vandalism. He’s also being held for trian for assaulting a 19-year-old Jewish woman and beating her so severely she required reconstructive surgery. The police learn that Jacob was working on an article exposing the contractor responsible for installing safety doors on a housing project in Harlem, as part of a city contract for which they were paid about $1.5 million. Only the police investigate the company and find it literally doesn’t exist. There’s not even a pro forma contractor billing the city for work they could have done but didn’t. All there is of it is a shell address and a phone number they poached from someone else.

It turns out the contract to this nonexistent company was granted by New York’s deputy mayor, a woman, though the reporter and his African-American woman assistant were on the trail of the corruption and were about to expose it when the villain of the piece, the con-man owner of the dummy corporation, David Costa (Andrew Rothenberg) puffed the deputy mayor and then killed Jacob Ackerman. Police detectives Frank Cosgrove (Jeffrey Donovan) and Jalen Shaw (Mehcad Brooks) search Costa’s apartment and find the knife Costa used to kill Ackerman, but a judge rules the knife inadmissible because of defects in the search warrant. The only way prosecutors Nolan Price (HughDancy) and Samantha Maroun (Odelya Halevi) can convict Costa is by giving the hateful neo-Nazi Lucas Hobbs immunity from prosecution for his wanton and unprovoked assault on a 19-year-old Jewish woman, which they eventually do so he can testify (accurately) that he saw Costa holding the murder weapon as he fled from Ackerman’s apartment after having killed him. There was a subplot involving the Black woman journalist’s confidential source , whom she won’t reveal even if that means letting a murderer go free, and where I thought this was going was she’d call him (or her) and they would eventually testify. Overall, this Law and Order, directed by Martha Mitchell (not the same one!) from a script by Art Alamo and Gia Gordon, was one of the better recent ones, full of the conflicts between characters and between ideals that make this still hte most worthwhile police show on television.

Law and Order: Special Victims Unit: "The Presence of Absence" (Dick Wolf Entertainment, Universal Television, NBC-TV, aired March 23, 2023)

by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2023 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Alas, neither the Law and Order: Special Victims Unit eposide nor the Law and Order: Organized Crime show that followed and completed the cycle were anywhere nearly as good. The SVU writers, Brianna Yellen and Brendan Feeney, were obviously trying too hard for novelty in this well-worn show in which they’ve already done all or most of the obvious sex crimes. Their story, “The Presence of Absence,” begins in a singles bar where Jenna Scott (Tory Trowbridge) has taken her best friend Zoe Greene (Eden Malyn) to get her laid for the first time since her husband Brian died of an aneurysm two years before. Jenna has been married for 10 years to Richard (Charles Warburton) but she seems to be living vicariously through Zoe. t one point Jenna signs Zoe to a dating app where she meets Klaus, a Swedish-born man who’s into BDSM play. The two carry on an online flirtation and eventually Klaus agrees tomeet Zoe, but only if she is blindfolded and he speaks in a whisper. Zoe comes back from the encounter with the feeling that she’s being raped – Klaus didn’t stop fucking her once Zoe used their safe word.She reports the encounter to the SVU detectives, and they find semen on her clothes that runs out to be a “familial match” to her late husband – indicating that she had sex with a relative of his. The DNA belongs to Brian’s nephew, medical student who’s working his way through college by being a sperm-bank donor. The police set up a “controlled meet” between Zoe and Klaus so they can arrest him – only “Klaus” turns out to be Zoe’s best friend Jenna, who bought a sperm donation from Brian’s nephew and used her finger to implant it into Zoe to get her pregnant, if not by her late husband, at least by the next best thing Nia Vardalos appears as Jenna’s defense attorney at the trial,for which the jury finds her innocent of aggravated sexual assault but convicts her on the eight lesser charges of sexual assault. Apparently they had as much trouble working through the compelxitite sof Jenna’s scheme as we did – especially after the defense attorney brought out the fact that Jenna and Zoe had experineted with a few Lesbian trysts with each other when they roomed together in college at a dormitory called “Athena” – hence the origin of Zoe’s safe word. It deservespoitns for being interesting and different, but maybe a bit too different to be all that entertaining.

Law and Order: Organized Crime: "Chinatown" (Dick Wolf Entertainment, Universal Television, NBC-TV, aired March 23, 2023)

by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2023 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

The Law and Order: Organized Crime episode that followed, “Chinatown,” was even weaker, obviously intended to set up a long-running “story arc” which I can’t stand. Frankly, I’ve liked the few episodes of Organized Crime that were complete in themselves, like Dick Wolf’s other New York-set crime shows, better than these sprawling homages to the Great God SERIAL. Written by Josh Fagin and Candice Sanches McFarlane, “Chinatown” is an extended tribute to the 49-year-old neo-noir Chinatown, made in 1974 and directed by Roman Polanski from a script by Robert Towne (which Polanski rewrote to be more nihilistic than Towne had intended). The Chinese-American community in New York is depicted as under relentless terror from street gangs operating with impunity and dealing in drugs, smuggling and human trafficking – much the same as the Black community as it was depicted in previous Organized Crime episodes – and there’s even a parallel in the assassination attempt on Jennifer Lee (Esther Chen), wife of reform-minded City Council candidate Stephen Lee (Grant Chang). Jennifer has angered the gang lords because she’s set up a safe house where young women who were trafficked can recover, get their lives turned around and ultimately find homes and steady legitimate employment. Midway through the show Stephen is so broken up by the assassination attempt on his wife he decides to drop out of the City Council campaign – and his campaign manager, Michael Quan (François Chau), agrees to run in his place. To absolutely no one’s surprise – no one in the audience, anyway – Quan turns out to be the mastermind of the human trafficking ring and the person who ordered the hit on Jennifer Lee. The writers obviously loved filling their script with variants on the famous line, “Forget it, Jake, it’s Chinatown,” from the Polanski-Towne film. About the only truly interesting plot twist is the meeting between the head of the Organized Crime Control Bureau, Sgt. Ayanna Bell (Danielle Moné Truitt), and the Asian-American detective she alternately crosses swords with and works with cooperatively, Detective Isabelle Chang (Angela Lin). Both are depicted as Lesbians whose wives left them because of the strains of being married to a cop, and one wonders whether Dick Wolf’s writers are hinting at a possible romance between the two. That would be nice!

Thursday, March 23, 2023

Wagner: Lohengrin (Metropolitan Opera "Live in HD," March 18, 2023, Rebroadcast March 22, 2023)

by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2023 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Yesterday (March 22) at noon my husband Charles and I were in theatre 14 of the AMC Mission Valley 20 movie complex watching the Metropolitan Opera’s “Live in HD” presentation of Wagner’s opera Lohengrin. The live performance actually took place Saturday, March 18 but because it was a Wagner opera, and therefore longer than most other people’s, the performance started at noon Eastern time – which would have been 9 a.m. Pacific time. The Met offered two “encore presentations” yesterday at noon and 6:30 p.m., and we chose the one at noon. Lohengrin takes about 3 ½ hours of actual opera, though with the intermissions and general padding we didn’t leave the theatre until 5 p.m.. Lohengrin was presented in a new production by French director François Girard, which made me hesitate momentarily because I’d seen his horrible production of Wagner’s last opera, Parsifal (a prequel of sorts to Lohengrin since Lohengrin is Parsifal’s son), and I had had a schizoid reaction to it. I loved the singing – especially from Jonas Kaufmann, the Parsifal, who’s the best Wagner tenor currently alive and active (Lauritz Melchior remains the greatest Wagner tenor of all time) – but hated Girard’s bizarre modern-dress production, in which the knights of the Holy Grail all wore long-sleeved white dress shirts and black slacks. (Since that was also the job attire then required by Charles’s workplace, when I came home and told him about the production he said, “You mean the Knights of the Grail all work at Vons?”) The worst part of Girard’s Parsifal was the attempted seduction of Parsifal by the female lead, Kundry, in which the bed they were on ended up so bloodstained it looked like at least three babies had been born on it. (There was a humorous feature during the intermission between acts two and three showing the tough task the stagehands had to clean it up.)

Fortunately, Girtard’s Lohengrin spared us most of the trickery he’d inflicted in Parsifal; though Lohengrin himself showed up in the same uniform of white shirt and black slacks (which Girard explained in an intermission interview was deliberately designed to link this to his Parsifal), the rest of the cast looked vaguely (and properly) medieval. The conductor, Yannick Nézet-Séguin (the Met’s current musical director), was slower than usual but not oppressively so. (I’m really tired of Wagner conductors who equate slow with “spiritual” and ponderous with “profound”.) The Lohengrin, Piotr Beczala, was a bit of a surprise since I’d seen him about five years ago in a Met production of Donizetti’s Lucia di Lammermoor in which he sang Edgardo, the male lead. Obviously Beczala is not a Heldentenor, but Lohengrin is one Wagner opera that doesn’t need one; it can be sung by a lighter-voiced singer (Jussi Björling had it in his repertoire even though I don’t think he sang any other Wagner work – not even Walther in Die Meistersinger, which would also have been well within his capabilities) and he cHe also looked good, which was more than could be said for the other principals; Russian baritone Evgeny Nikitin as Telramund was dramatically strong but his body was the sort of hefty size that people who don’t like opera like to make fun of – and so were the two women. Tamara Wilson as Elsa was properly dreamy and vocally right for the part, but both she and the Ortrud, Christine Goerke (who joked during the intermission interview about switching from the Mother Superior in Poulenc’s Dialogues of the Carmelites – the leader of a convent being threatened with massacre during the French Revolution – to a pagan villainess) were, to put it politely, zaftig. Then again, given that many of the top female voices in pop music now come from “women of size,” including Adele, Lizzo and Megan Thee Stallion, maybe it’s time to put an end to all the jokes about opera singers, especially women, being large.

I’d seen Lohengrin live on stage once at the San Francisco Opera in 1978, in a production that was supposed to feature René Kollo (one of the better wanna-be Heldentenoren of the late 1970’s whom my mom, my brother and I had been wowed by in a Met broadcast of the role), but at the last minute he bowed out and was replaced by French tenor Guy Chauvet, who was hardly in the same league. But that was in the pre-titles age and so I didn’t get the minute-by-minute experience you get now either on video or "live" in a house where supertitles are being used. This time around I noticed in ways I hadn’t before how much Lohengrin is a story about identity, about what makes us who we are and how the names we call ourselves and each other shape our perceptions. This was a live issue for Wagner, who spent the first nne years or so of his life being called “Richard Geyer” after his stepfather, Ludwig Geyer, a boarder at the Wagner home who married Wagner’s mother six months after Herr Wagner died. Wagner’s biographers are still arguing over which of the two men in his mother’s life was his biological father, and it was a live issue in Wagner’s time for a number of reasons, not the least of which because “Geyer” sounded Jewish. “Geier” is also the German word for “vulture,” and a lot of anti-Semitic propaganda of the time denounced the Jews as vultures living off the achievements of Christian civilization and contributing nothing themselves. Itr was not until his teen years that “Richard Geyer” officially became “Richard Wagner,” and I remember doing the same thing myself: through much of my childhood I was called “Mark Folger,” after my stepfather, and it was only when I realized that the shadowy figure called “Daddy George” who came into and out of my life off and on was my biological father that I insisted on calling myself “Mark Conlan” and demanded that my mom have my school records changed accordingly.

The central premise of Lohengrin – that the heroine is saved from disgrace and possibly execution by a mysterious stranger who proposes marriage to her but only on condition that she never seek to know just who he is or where he’s from – had already been used by Wagner in his very first opera, Die Feen (“The Fairies”), though in that case the genders were reversed: the fairy queen Ada fell in love with and wanted to marry a mortal man, but he was not allowed to ask her who she was or where she was from. What’s more, Die Feen was based on a story by Italian writer Carlo Gozzi, and one of his other stories served as the basis of Puccni’s unfinished last opera, Turandot – also about a mystery prince who must conceal his name. During the opening scene between the bad guys, Telramund and Ortrud, at the start of act two, it occurred to me that the relationship between them was very much like that of Mr. and Mrs. Macbeth – a basically decent but weak man and his ambitious, psychopathic wife. Then I realized that Verdi had been writing the first (Florence, 1847) version of his opera Macbeth at about the same time Wagner was composing Lohengrin. There’s another Shakespeare parallel which I realized when Tamara Wilson was interviewed for one of the intermission features and mentioned that she had previously sung Desdemona in Verdi’s opera Otello – and it struck me that both Desemona and Elsa have their marriages ruined and their lives prematurely ended because they or their husbands fall for a villain’s lie.

Over and over again, Wagner was drawn to stories about men whose identities are uncertain; Siegmund, Siegfried, Tristan and Parsifal all grow up literally not knowing who they are, and for each of them it’s a major step in their character arcs when they find out. It’s certainly true that stories about heroes who arrive to do good deeds but conceal their true identities are nothing new – they’re as old as the Arthurian legends and as new as comic-book superheroes – and Lohengrin’s self-presentation in the aria “In fernem Land,” in which he answers the questions about who he is and where he comes from, makes him sound like a medieval version of James Bond: an agent sent out by a mysterious organization of great power to right the world’s wrongs and foil dastardly plots against humanity and justice. I used to admire Lohengrin more than I do now; it’s still very much an old-fashioned opera with recognizable and distinct arias, duets, ensembles and choruses, and after the psychological complexity of the male leads in Wagner’s immediately previous operas, The Flying Dutchman and Tannhäuser, Lohengrin seems like a step backwards into a world in which the heroes are very, very good, the villains are very, very bad, and it’s all too easy to tell which are which. This time around I raised it back up in my estimation of the Wagner canon.

It’s true that some of Girard’s staging ideas were a bit silly – though nowhere as bad as the horrors he inflicted on Parsifal a decade ago. He decided to set most of the opera in an underground grotto – this was apparently supposed to represent a post-apocalyptic future but it looked pretty medieval-basic to me – with Lohengrin descending into it on his entrance. One good thing Girard did was outfit the choruses with variable-colored costumes, dark green or red when their flaps were closed and pure white (or at least what was supposed to be pure white, since Charles complained that the “whites” got awfully yellow-looking as the performance progressed), so you could readily tell when the choristers were supposed to be good and when they were supposed to be evil. But I was disappointed in the lack of a swan to draw the boat on which Lohengrin arrived (there wasn’t a boat, either), and the big duel between Lohengrin and Telramund at the end of act one was rather stupidly staged with only one sword between them. I’d noted that the set and costume designer, Tim Yip, nad won an Academy Award 20 years ago for the film Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, and while he probably had nothing to do with the film’s martial-arts sequences I briefly hoped that the Lohengrin-Telramund battle would be staged as a martial-arts duel. Then again, as Charles pointed out, given the physiques ot the singers involved, especially Nikitin’s, it’s hard to imagine that working. Given what he’d done with the bed in Act II of Parsifal, I was dreading what Girard and Yip were going to do with hte bed in the Bridal Chamber scene – but there was no bed; Lohengrin and Elsa just faced each other standing up as she asked the fatal question. Still, I found myself thinking about Lohengrin in new ways after seeing this presentation of it – and that’s what new productions of a classic are supposed to do.

NOVA: "Ancient Maya Metropolis" (WGBH, PBS, 2022)

by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2023 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

I watched a couple of PBS shows at 9 p.m., a NOVA called “Ancient Maya Metropolis” and a Secrets of the Dead show re-telling the story of the voyage of Ferdinand Magellan. “Ancient Maya Metropolis,” first aired January 26, 2022, was about the Mayan city of Caracol, located in what is now Belize (which used to be British Honduras and, since it was a British colony, its official language is English). The show posed the question of why, around 1000 A.D., the Mayans successively abandoned their major cities after building up huge civilizations even in the midst of tropical rainforests. The answer appears to be a series of civil wars that depopulated the southern Mayan region (which extended through what’s now Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and Nicaragua), and the ongoing political turmoil between the Mayan city-states that ended with the population of each one in turn fleeing to the Mayan regions to the north, in what is now Mexico (the country you think of first as home of the Maya). There were predictable interviews with modern-day Mayans about how they had a perfectly respectable civilization just fine, thank you, and didn’t need to be “discovered” by white people from Europe. The irony there is that when Hernán Cortés invaded Mexico he couldn't have conquered it, even with the advantage of firearms, without indigenous help – and he got it from the Maya, who were restively enduring the tyranny of the Aztecs, who had replaced them as Mexico’s indigenous rulers.

Secrets of the Dead: "Magellan's Crossing" (PBS, 2021)

by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2023 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

The Secrets of the Dead episode, “Magellan’s Crossing,” originally aired December 20, 2021, was a pretty straightforward account of Magellan’s ill-fated voyage across the Atlantic, then across the Pacific and finally around ther world – though Magellan himself didn’t live to make the full crossing. Instead he got caught up in an indigenous war between two rival lings on islands that are now part of Indonesia, and he was killed in battle by a native chief after he had deliberately told the natives allied with Spain not to participate but just to watch. The purpose of Magellan’s expedition was to find an alternate route to the Spice Islands, which were crucially important to Eurpopeans because in the days before refrigeration, the only way to preserve food long-term was to smoke it with spices. Like Columbis and a lot of other explorers in the so-called “Age of Discovery,” Magellan was done in as much as anything by the bizarre underetimation common in his time of the size of the world. Ancient Greeks had not only correctly known the world was round but had estimated its correct size within 7.5 percent of the currently known value – Archimedes not only famously measured the world, he did it twice, and his second go-round was even more accurate htan the first. But the medieval explorers of Spain and Portugal thought the world was only two-fifths to one-half its actual size, and when Magellan finally sailed his ships around the cape at Tierra del Fuego (after first stumbling on the Rio de la Plata and mistaking it for the ocean crossing), he thought he was only a few days’ sailing away from the Spice Islands instead of tens of thousands of miles away from them.

After Magellan’s death, what was left of his expedition – it had set out from Spain with five ships and over 200 men, and when it returned there was only one ship and 18 survivors – was commanded by Juan Sebastian Elcano, a Castilian sailor and one of the most unjustly forgotten men in world history. Magellan’s voyage was beset by various catastrophes, including not only his own death en route but at least two mutinies (the first, not mentioned here, involved Magellan’s death sentence against a sailor caught having sex with one of the cabin boys; at the time homosexuality was a capital crime in Spain, as it was through most of Europe, but was more or less tolerated in a don’t-ask-don’t-tell manner on board ships taking long voyages), and Elcano had participated in the second mutiny but Magellan had pardoned him because he needed his skills as a navigator. There was an ironic sequence during which a woman from one of the indigenous communities around Tierra del Fuego complained that the Spaniards had devastated the local population and therefore they weren’t going to celebrate the 500=th anniversary of Magellan’s voyage – only she made her complaint against the Spaniards in Spanish. There were also fascinating political complications to the voyage; Magellan was actually Portuguese (his birth name was Magelhanes) and, like Columbus, had originally approached the King of Portugal for sponsorship money. When the Portuguese king turned him down, Magellan then went to King Charles V of Portugal’s arch-rival, Spain, which got him denounced by the Portuguese as a traitor, while virtually all his officers and crew members were Spanish and they didn’t trust him, either. It’s a fascinating story and one final irony is that, though the one ship that finally made it back to Spain was barely seaworthy and had to be bailed out every day on the last leg of the trip, somehow the cargo of spices it had collected on its way survived intact and was sold off – so Magellan’s voyage was one of the few that actually mademoney for its investors and the Spanish crown.

Wednesday, March 22, 2023

Louis Armstrong, 1900 [sic]-1971 (CBS-TV News, aired July 9, 1971)

by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2023 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Last night (March 21) at about 9:50 my husband Charles and I watched a YouTube post (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkKNWrmAoSc) of a quite intriguing instant documentary produced by CBS News on the life of Louis Armstrong, Louis Armstrong: 1900-1971, shown on July 9, 1971 – just three days after Armstrong’s death. It opened with a scene of one of Louis Armstrong’s last live appearances – him singing “Hello, Dolly!” (the 1964 Broadway show tune Armstrong recorded and had the biggest hit of his career on; amazingly, it was the biggest hit by anybody in 1964; the Beatles placed numbers two through six) in one of his last live shows on July 3, 1970. (Armstrong spent most of the last year of his life in various hospital beds, though he rallied long enough to record one more album, Louis Armstring and His Friends, on which he recorded the civil-rights anthem “We Shall Overcome” and John Lennon’s “Give Peace a Chance.”) The show was narrated by Walter Cronkite and Charles Kuralt, with archival footage of Edward R. Murrow interviewing Armstrong for the 1955 film Satchmo the Great. The footage of Armstrong’s funeral, shot that very morning at a church in Corona, Queens, New York (the neighborhood where Armstrong settled on the rare occasions when he wasn’t on tour), included Peggy Lee singing Albert Hay Mallotte’s setting of the Lord’s Prayer (usually one of hte dullest pieces of music ever written, though Mahalia Jacksin’s amazing recording for once made Mallotte’s music seem worthy of the words, and though she wasn’t in Mahalia’s league Lee did a surprisingly ood job) and Al Hiubbler singing “When the Saints Go Marching In” (slowly nad mournfully, as befit the occasion).

The second part of the program was a capsule biography of Armstrong, repeating the myth that he was born on July 4, 1900. That’s what Armstrong believed his birth date was and it’s what everyone else thought, too, until an Armstrong biographer discovered his birth certificate after Armstorng’s death and it turned out he’d actually been born on August 4, 1901. (He would be a Leo.) It featured a nicely eclectic batch of film clips, including “The Skeleton in the Closet” from the 1936 film Pennies from Heaven, the title song of the 1952 film Glory Alley (a quite interesting melodrama with Ralph Meeker as a boxer who’s born dirt poor on Glory Alley in New Orleans, rises to fame and then loses it all nd ends up back on the alley where he was born), “High Society Rag” and his duet with Bing Crosby from the 1956 MGM musical High Society (a remake of The Philadelphia Story with Crosby at least serviceable and often more than that in Cary Grant’s role, and Grace Kelly hopelessly glacial in Katharine Hepburn’s part – how was Alfred Hitchcock able to make Kelly sensual and alluring in their three films together, while in all her other movies she’s so icy she could have sunk the Titanic?) and his duet with Barbra Streisand on the title song of the 1969 film Hello, Dolly!, a wretched, ponderous musical of which one critic said that the Armstrong-Streisand duet was “the only thing in the movie that ended too soon.” (It’s interesting that Armstrong was able to get Bing Crosby to swing – though Crosby was a superb jazz singer in his own right – but he couldn’t do the same with Streisand.)

For the third part of the film the CBS production crew brought together an all-swtar lineup of musicians, mostly people who’d played with Armstrong: trumpeters John “Dizzy” Gillespie and Bobby Hackett (who had just made a Grammy Award-winning jazz album called Giants with pianist Mary Lou Williams), trombonist Tyree Glenn, tenor saxophonist Budd Johnson, pianist Earl “Fatha” Hines,” bassist Milt Hinton and drummer Buddy Rich. Charles Kuralt did interviews with the musicians, most of whom had played and/or recorded with Armstrong, and the most interesting comment was from Hines. He said he and Armstrong first met at a pool table at the American Federation of Musicians local in Chicago (that would have been the Black local because at the time the musicians’ union was segregated and in the largest cities maintained separate white and Black locals). They played pool against each other and only later realized that they had much in common musically; Armstrong and Hines made a dazzling series of records together in 1928. Hines demonstrated what became known as his “trumpet-style piano,” which basically meant playing octaves instead of just single-note lines (he said he started doing that to make sure he could be heard instead of being drowned out by the rest of the band). Then the band played two songs identified with Armstrong, “I Can’t Give You Anything but Love” (Armstrong’s first pop record, made in 1929) with a vocal by Peggy Lee, and an instrumental version of Armstrong’s theme song, “When It’s Sleepy Time Down South,” featuring lovely trumpet counterpoint by Gillespie and Hackett. Kuralt had asked Dizzy just what he had in common with Armstrong when they represented two different styles and eras n jazz history, and Dizzy pointed out that when he was first starting out his model had beey Roy Eldridge – and Eldridge;s main influence had been Armstrong. Early in the show Cronkite had quoted Miles Davis’s comment from a 1957 interview, “You know, you can’t play anything on a horn that Louis hasn’t played – I mean, even modern.” All in all, this documentary was a real treasure, a look back at a time when TV was still at least sometimes a class act and the major commercial networks respected America’s cultural history enough to do this sort of program.

Tuesday, March 21, 2023

The Circus (Charles Chaplin Studios, U(noted Artists, Roy Export Company, 1928, revised 1977)

by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2023 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Last night (March 20) Turner Classic Movies’ “31 Days of Oscar” did a night about silent films that won or were nominated for Academy Awards – of which there aren’t many because the Academy awards started in 1928, at the tail end of the silent era, and in fact The Jazz Singer won a special Academy Award the first year for its pioneering use of synchronized sound. That first year there were actually two Best Picture winners: William Wellman’s Wings won for “Best Production,” while F. W. Munau’s Sunrise won for “Most Artistic Quality of Production” – a demarcation I think the Academy should return to: that way they could give the Best Productoin award to a big commercial blockbuster that would get people to tune in to the show on TV, while they could give the Artistic Quality award to the kinds of independent movies the Academy has favored in recent years. (I think some people at the Academy agree with me, because they briefly floated adding a category called “Outstanding Achievement in Popular Film” until a lot of people ridiculed the whole idea.) Of the five silent films TCM showed last night,my husband Charles and I watched two: Charlie Chaplin’s The Circus and King Vidor’s The Crowd, both released in 1928 but with more tangled production histories than that.

The Circus was Chaplin’s immediate follow-up to The Gold Rush (1925) and it was made at a particualrly troubled time in Chaplin’s career. Chaplin’s second wife, Lita Grey, was suing him for divorce and putting out a lot of salacious details about his alleged perverted sexual practices with her. Apparently the campaign was masterminded by Lita Grey’s mother, since Lita was only 17 when they married (so mom had had to give permission, which she had done reluctantly because she thought marrying Chaplon would help boost Lita’s own career as an actress). In fact, all Chaplin’s wives were teenagers when he married them, and like Woody Allen (whose career is strikingly similar to Chaplin’s in his relative artistic freedom, his ability to create films that mixed comedy and drama, and his penchant for much younger sex partners) Chapin was frequently damned as a pedophile. As part of a last-ditch attempt to save their marriage, Lita insisted that Chaplin cast Merna Kennedy, her good friend, as the female lead in The Circus because Lita trusted Kennedy not to have an affair with Chaplin – though, at least according to some sources, Chaplin successfully seduced her anyway.

The Circus was also a troubled production in various other ways, including a fire that destroyed the principal circus set (which had to be rebuilt identically so pre-fire and pos-fire sce3nes would match) and a flaw in the film during the climactic tightrope scene (in which Chaplin doubles for Rex, the circus’s professional tightrope walker and, of course, his rival for Merna’s affections), which necessitated doing the entire scene over again. (Chaplin had taught himself to walk a tightrope for the scene.) What resulted, as I told Charles the first time we watched The Circus together, was one of the most underrated films in Chaplin’s entire canon, a heartfelt masterpiece in which Chaplin plays a man who can make others laugh only when he doesn’t intend to; when he tries to be funny, he fails dismally. Chaplin ends up in the circus by accident when a pickpocket frames him by planting a stolen wallet on him just as a cop comes by. He finds himself being chased not only by the cop but also by the wallet’s rightful owner, and as part of the chase he runs into the circus during a performance. The audience laughs uproariously at his antics and demands to see more of “the funny man.”

The circus is run by a villainous ringmaster (Allan Garcia) who’s so evil that if Charles Dickens had been around to read Chaplin’s script, he’d probably have told Chaplin, “You’re way overdoing it.” As punishment for Merna missing a jump in her horseback-riding act, he decrees that Merna must not eat until he relents and allows her to – and when Chaplin and some of the stagehands surreptitiously try to slip her food, he literally rips it out of her nands just before she can actually eat it. (This reminded me of how MGM treated Judy Garland an decade or so later; they were so determined to keep her weight down they would assign her minders to steal food from her hands before she could out it in her mouth.) When Rex doesn’t show up for work one day, Chaplin takes his place on the high wire, apparently thinking this will impress Merna and lead her to transfer her affections back to him. One of the stagehands outfits Chaplin with a special appliance that will literally catch him if he falls, but midway through his performance the appliance slips out and Chaplin, unaware of this, continues a literally death-defying performance.

I fell in love with The Circus the first time I saw it, and still think it’s one of Chaplin’s best films. It and the 1952 film Limelight, Chaplin’s last film produced in the United States (even though it was set in Chaplin’s native England) are the only feature films in Chaplin’s career about making comedy, and Limelight was also produced during a particularly troubled timein Chaplin’s career, when he was under ivnestigationby the House Committee on Un-American Activities and the State Department was threatening to deport him – which they eventually did by revoking his return visa as he and his last wife, Oona O’Neill Chaplin, were vacationing in Europe. (He stayed in Europe, ultimately settled in Switzerland and made two more films there until his triumphant return to the U.S. to accept a special Academy Award in 1972. HIs wife, a native-born U.S. citizen, had to come to the U.S. to collect all Chaplin’s money and take it back with her.)

The Crowd (MGM, 1928)

by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2023 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Last night (March 20) I was able to catch up with a movie I’d long wanted to see but hadn’t had a chance to yet: The Crowd, a 1928 silent film directed and co-written by King Vidor. Though he made at least two other films between Vidor’s smash hit The Big Parade and The Crowd – a Rafael Sabatini swashbuckler called Bardelys the Magnificent and La Bohème, starring Lillian Gish in an adaptation of Henri Murger’s novel rather than Puccini’s opera – The Crowd was a deeply personal project for Vidor. As Vidor told Charles Higham and Joel Greenberg in The Celluloid Muse, when MGM production chief Irving Thalberg wanted to know how he intended to follow up The Big Parade – a blockbuster hit and the second highest-grossing silent film ever made (after The Birth of a Nation) – “I suggested the theme of a man observing everyday life.”

The Crowd was essentially a neo-realist film 20 years early; like the Italian directors like Roberto Rossellini and Vittorio de Sica who founded the neo-realist movement in the closing days of World War II, Vidor not only picked a story about ordinary people but shot it largely on location. The setting is New York City and, as Vidor told Higham and Greenberg, “I shot probably half of the film on location in New York. We went all around the city with hidden cameras, which was way ahead of its time. Mostly we shot out of the back end of a truck through a hole cut in the flap, and occasionally out of a camera hidden in a packing box.” Vidor worked with Cedric Gbbons. Head of MGM’s art department, and special effects master A. Arnold Gillespie to create some of the most audacious sets ever seen in a film to that time, including an unforgettable geometric construction to reflect the anguish the film’s central character, John Sims (James Murray). feels when his father dies. There’s also the huge room of identical desks in the office in which John Sims works, in which his is desk 137, a scene so chillingly impersonal (I suspect Vidor was influenced by Elmer Rice’s 1923 abstract play, The Adding Machine) that only after John Sims quits his job in disgust and his wife Mary (Eleanor Boardman, Mrs. King Vidor at the time) doesn’t know this, that they attend a picnic at the company and we find out it was called Atlas Insurance.

Vidor acknowledged being influenced by German directors’ films, including E. A. Dupont’s Variety (1925) and Fritz Lang’s Metropolis (1927), though the film’s main dramatic issues are the sheer ambitionlessness of Murray’s character and the huge number of people in New York City, so that even when John and Mary try to entertain or recreate themselves, they’re confronted by huge masses of humanity. The Crowd opens on July 4, 1900, when John Sims is born and his dad decides that that’s an omen that he’s destined for great things. I couldn’t help but think of Louis Armstrong, who always celebrated his birthday as July 4, 1900 (and who was destined for great things) even though his birth certificate, not discovered until after Armstrong’s death, revealed his actual birth date was August 4, 1901. Unfortunately, after John Sims’ father dies and he grows up, he decides to move to New York City and the city and its huge population basically swallows him up. John Sims is determined – or says he is – to study and make something of himself, but one night his best friend Bert (Bert Roach) asks John to join him on a double date to Coney Island. Once there, John falls hard for Mary, proposing to her on the spot.

The two honeymoon in – guess where? – Niagara Falls, where there’s some dazzling process work showing John and Mary at the falls, at a time when process work was still in its infancy and only filmmakers in Germany and Denmark had much experience with it. Later there’s a scene in which a squad of fire engines suddenly cross the street just as John and Mary are trying to get by, and I thought of the “Help is on the way!” sequence from the Marx Brothers’ Duck Soup – ahd then I realized the two films actually had at least one thing in common: Henry Sharp was the cinematographer on both. John and Mary Sims’ life together is one of barely holding on to middle-class status; they have two children, a son and a daughter (in that order), and they take them to a crowded beach where the son kicks sand over their cake (baking layer cakes seems to be a Mary Sims specialty). Through much of the film John Sims iinvents advertising slogans and plans to enter contests for them but never actually does so; the one time he actually submits an entry on time, he wins a $500 prize and then, just when we’re finally relieved that something good has happened to him, something else happens to him that’s far worse. His daughter is run down in the street by a truck driver, and there are a few tense moments with the doctor before she finally dies.

The shock of losing his daughter totally unhinges John. He loses the ability to concentrate on his work (illustrated in another ahead-of-its-time shot by Vidor and Sharp showing numbers literally dancing around John’s head). He’s upbraided by his former friend Bert, who worked his way into management by hob-nobbing with the bosses, and quits the job before they can fire him. John tries to find work but the only thing he can get is jobs selling vacuum cleaners door-to-door, at which he’s hopeless. He’s on the opint of committing suicide by throwing himself off a trestle onto the path of a moving train, but he thinks of his son – who’s with him at the time – and changes his mind. Eventually he lands a job juggling ont he street to attract attention to a new product –º he has to do this in a clown suit and Vidor is enough of a master at story construction that the costume he has to wear is the same as he saw on someone else on his way o ut to Coney Island the night he and Mary met. Mary is about to leave him and her mother and two brothers are ready to take her back, only she relents when John shows up with tickets for three to a vaudeville show. John explains to Mary that he’s finally landed a job and is going to work hard to make something of himself at long last, and half our mind is thinking, “At last!,” while the other half is thinking, “Yeah, right.”

The Crowd
was a box-office disappointment; thanks to Vidor’s guerrilla style of filmmaking, it hadn’t cost much to make (about $325,000) but “its success was mainly critical,” as Vidor acknowledged to Higham and Greenberg. “The theatres, which were all very large, would be maybe half-filled with a lot of very enthusiastic people. The Crowd would have been an ideal art-house film, attracting the 1920’s equivalent of the audiences that now patronize Fellini films, but we didn’t have art-house chains then; they were slow developing.” I suspect The Crowd would have beena tough sell in any era – it’s clearly a magnificent piece of work but it’s also so relentlessly depressing – and its Zeitgeist is more that of a Warner Bros. Depression-era film than something one expects from MGM at the height of the 1920’s economic boom. One of the saddest wonders of The Crowd is how much the real James Murray resembled the character he plays: an un-driven alcoholic who met his end at age 35 in a drunken accidental drowning. When Vidor was making his fascinating independent film Our Daily Bread (1934), he found Murray and offered him a role “provided he sobered up and lost some of his beer fat,” Vidor recalled. “Oh, screw you,” Murray told him, and that was the last time Vidor ever saw him.

Monday, March 20, 2023

Murder on the Orient Express (EMI Film Distributors, G. W. Films Limited, Paramount, 1974)


by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2023 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Eventually last night my husband Charles and I watched two films on Turner Classic Movies, both in the mystery-suspense genre, Murder on the Orient Express (the original 1974 version) and In the Heat of the Night. Murder on the Orient Express was based on a novel by Agatha Christie called Murder in the Calais Coach (apparently the individual cars on the legendary Orient Express train from Istanbul to Calais each had their own names) published, at least according to Amazon.com’s listing, on January 1, 1933. By now just about everyone knows the “spoiler” ending Christie concocted for this story: all the suspects are guilty of killing the victim, American businessman John Ratchett (Richard Widmark),whose real name turns out to be “Castelli.” I read Murder in the Calais Coach but only in the late 1970’s, and my only recollection of it his that Christie nade the victim a child molester and had the families of his victims unite to do him in on the train. For the movie screenwriter Paul Dehn changed the backstory and drew on the 1932 kidnapping of Charles Lindbergh, Jr. – though he changed the family’s name from “Lindbergh” to “Amrstrong,” made them British instead of American, moved the kidnapping up two years to 1930 and changed the kidnapping victim from a son to a daughter, Daisy. Not only did Daisy get killed by her kidnapper, but Daisy’s mother died in childbirth, her second baby was stillborn, the Armstrongs’ maid – who was wrongly accused of complicity in the kidnapping – killed herself, and so did Col. Armstrong after the loss of both his daughter and his wife. Another man was arrested, convicted and executed for the kidnapping, but according to Dehn’s script Ratchett a.k.a. Castelli masterminded the whole crime, thereby leaving lots of people who hated him.

Among them are American actress Mrs. Hubbard (Lauren Bacall), Swedish housemaid Greta (Ingrid Bergman), aspiring actor McQueen (Anthony Perkins), Col. Armstrong’s former butler Beddoes (John Gielgud), Russian Countess Andreyva (Jacqueline Bisset) and her Hungarian diplomat husband (Michael York), Col. Arbuthnot (Sean Connery) – a veteran of the Gurkhas (native troops commanded by the Brits during the Indian raj) – and his girlfriend Mary Debenham (Vanessa Redgrave), whom he can’t marry because he already has a wife and he’s scared of being seen with Mary because his wife could use that against him in their divorce (I vividly remember movies like Alfred Hitchcock’s 1927 Easy Virtue and James Whale’s 1934 One More River as examples of how combative British divorces could be in this era), plus assorted figures including Bianchi (Martin Balsam), Pierre (Jean Pierre Casell), Hardman (Colin Blakely), Hildegarde (Rachel Roberts) and Princess Dragomiroff (Wendy Hiller in the role producers John Brabourne and Richard Goodwin originally wanted Bergman for, but she turned it town and asked to play Greta instead because Greta, like Bergman, was Swedish). There’s also a doctor (George Coulouris from Citizen Kane) who jumps to the conclusion, after Christie’s most famous “sleuth” character, Hercule Poirot (Albert Finney), interrogates each suspect in turn, that that person is the murderer.

Murder on the Orient Express was finished just a few months before Agatha Christie died, and it was screened for her and she liked it – only the second time she’d liked any of the films made from her work. (The first was Billy Wilder’s marvelous film of Christie’s play Witness for the Prosecution, made in 1957 and the last completed film of Tyrone Power.) Murder on the Orient Express isn’t that great a movie; the director is Sidney Lumet, but he did much better films than this. Albert Finney way overacts as Poirot – it’s true Agatha Christie wrote the character as a series of exaggerated mannerisms, but David Sachet in the long-running BBC-TV series of Poirot’s adventures showed you could make the character less forbidding and more human than Finney does here. There is a touch of Sherlock Holmes’s nobility in the way Poirot decides at the end to let the murderers get away with it, pinning the crime instead on an unknown (and nonexistent) man who supposedly stole a porter’s uniform, committed the crime and then escaped from the train while it was stuck behind a snowbank (the last scene of the film shows a “plow train” pushing snow out of the way of the tracks so the Orient Express can go on its merry way). This suggests an interesting possibility for a sequel: a man is actually arrested and charged with being the killer, and Poirot and the others have a crisis of conscience over whether they should come forward with the preposterous truth or let an innocent man hang for the crime.

Raymond Chandler was scathing in his comments about Murder in the Calais Coach, calling it “the sort of thing that would throw the most intelligent reader for a loop. Only a half-wit could guess it.” Chandler generally couldn’t stand Christie – in one of his letters he named Christie and Erle Stanley Gardner as the best-selling mystery writers of his time, and said he couldn’t be objective about them for opposite reasons (he couldn’t stand Christie, while he and Gardner were close friends), and the particular reason Chandler couldn’t stand Christie was he felt she wasn’t interested enough in characterizations. To Chandler, Christie’s people were cardboard creations made up to enact a murder mystery, not the vivid, complex, multidimensional characters Chandler himself tried to create (and usually succeeded). He made an exception for The Murder of Roger Ackroyd, in which Christie broke one of the traditional rules of mystery writing and made the narrator the murderer,but other than that he had nothing good to say about her. I agreed with him and it was not until I discovered Ruth Rendell that I realized a British woman who wrote mysteries had created fascinating multidimensional characters.

I also found it amazing that Ingrid Bergman won the third Academy Award of her career (and her first in the Supporting Actress category), when if anybody in this cast deserved an award it was not Bergman but Lauren Bacall (who’s a charter member of the list of great stars that never won the Oscar, along with Cary Grant, Barbara Stanwyck, Greta Garbo, John Garfield, Montgomery Clift and many others). Bacall marks every scene she’s in with grat power and authority. Murder on the Orient Express is also an all-star movie, and therefore a good one for drawing degrees-of-separation comparisons, including two women (Bergman and Bacall) who were important to Humphrey Bogart’s career (and in Bacall’s case in his personal life as well!), and it reunited two cast members from Hitchcock’s Psycho, Anthony Perkins and Martin Balsam.

In the Heat of the Night (Mirisch Corporation, United Artists, 1967)

by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2023 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

Following Murder on the Orient Express, Charles and I watched In the Heat of the Night, which I’d seen at least twice before, once in its original theatrical release when I was 14, and again on a previous occasion with Charles (my journal entry on it is dated January 26, 2003, which means we probably watched it together the night before, though my file is blocked because it was created with an old, incompatible version of Microsoft Word). On the second go-round the film seemed awfully dated; the casting of Sidney Poitier as Black Northern super-cop Virgil Tibbs and Rod Steiger as white cracker police chief Bill gillespie in Sparta, Mississippi made the film seem like just another one of Poitier’s “super-Black” roles. Here, as in his other Academy Award-nominated Best Picture for 1967, Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner?, he’s playing the sort of Black man your average white family would want their daughter to marry – and of Poitier’s three films that year I liked the third one, To Sir, with Love, best because there was nothing in the story that required Poitier’s character to be Black. He was a tough teacher winning over a class of loutish students in a British proletarian town, and the only reason the character is Black is because the actor playing him is.

Seen in 2023, In the Heat of the Night has re-acquired the chilling relevance director Norman Jewison and writers John Ball (author of the original novel on which the film was based) and StirlilNg Silliphant (who did the screenplay) intended it to have, as racial and gender politics in the South and elsewhere have gone so far backwards in the age of Donald Trump. The horror Trump has wreaked on American history is such that the openly racist attitudes of Chief Gillespie and, even more so, the other white characters in this film have become open, blatant parts of American political discourse, and people who think that way once again feel emboldened to express them with a sense of pride. In the Heat of the Night is a murder mystery, though as Ben Mankiewicz said in his introduction to TCM’s showing of the film, there have been few (if any) films ostensibly in the mystery-suspense genre in which the question of “whodunit” has been less relevant or audience-involving.

The film opens with Virgil Tobbs sitting at the railway station, alone and waiting for the night train to take him from Sparta, Mississippi to Memphis, Tennessee on his way back to his home town of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,where he’s a homicide detective. Suddenly he’s accosted by a gun-wielding white police officer and arrested for a crime he had no idea had even happened, the murder of a rich white Northerner named Colbert who was planning to build a factory in Sparta that would have created 1,000 jobs, half of them for Black people. As I observed about the film in 2003, in many ways the relationship between Tibbs and Gillespie is Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson all over again – though perhaps the better parallel is Holmes and Inspector Lestrade, the bumbling official detective who comes to the obvious (and wrong) conclusions versus the big-city consultant who figures it out and comes up with the right answer.

But In the Heat of the Night is a deeper, richer film than most of Poitier’s liberal racial caricature roles in this period. It’s also a film about capitalism and how the dying traditions of the South live on in the character of Eric Endicott (Larry Gates), the super-rich white guy who owns the town’s cotton plantation that is Sparta’s only source of income nd who thought of Colbert’s factory as a threat not only to his income but his whole ability to run Sparta as his own private fiefdom. Through much of the film I w3as thinking of Mississippi-born author William Faulkner’s famous line about the traditions that gripped the South: “The past isn’t over; it’s not even past.” When Tibbs, accompanied by Gillespie, visits Endicott and questions him about whether Endicott ordered Colbert’s murder,gets slapped by Endicott and slaps him back, Endicott turns to Gillespie and says, “Did you see that?” and Gillespie says, “In another time I could have shot you dead on the spot.”

There’s also a crittique of sexism in the film in the person of Dolores Purdy (Quentin Dean – a woman named Quentin?), a woman who likes to parade around in her house all day naked and by doing this excites the attention of various men, including Harvey Oberst (Scott Wilson), who was busted for coming on to her and later is accused of the murder of Colbert once Gillespie is convinced Tibbs didn’t do it. She’s just become pregnant and the man involved, Courtney (Peter Whitney), tok $800 from Endicott to kill Colbert in order to pay for her illegal abortion from Mama Caleba (Beah Richards, a marvelous performance that makes her one scene indelible) – the sort of person we thought would have been put out of business forever in the Roe v. Wade era but is no doubt coming back now that Roe is overturned, many states (including virtually all the South) has already made abortion illegal, and a nationwide ban is almost certain to be enacted as soon as the Republicans once again control the Presidency and both houses of Congress.

There’s also the fascianting character of Colbert’s widow (Lee Grant, who also delivers a powerful performance that remains indelible on the memory even though she’s in very few scenes), who insists that Tibbs be allowed to investigate her husband’s murder or else she’ll pu9ll the factory he was already building in Sparta and move it somewhere else. And there’s a clash between old-fashioned policing, in which the cops light on the most likely suspect they can find and browbeat him into confessing whether he’s guilty or not, and Tibbs’ more scientific approach. He personally takes over the autopsy from the disinterested town doctor, and he deduces Harvey cannot have been the murderer because Harvey is left-handed and it was clear theblow that linked Colbert was struck by a right-handed person – though there’s a major glitch in the portrayal of Tibbs’s character: even in 1967 it seemed unbelievable to me that an experienced homicide detective would conduct a forensic examination of a car without wearing gloves or putting any evidence he gathered in plastic bags. I also liked the clear bit of status envy when Tibbs tells Gillespie that he makes $162.50 perwek for being a Philadelphia homicide cop and it’s obvious from gillespies reaction that that’s far more than what he makes for what amounts to the same job.

In the Heat of the Night has its flaws, including a musical score by Quincy Jones that is far better than the pastiche with wich Rodney Russell Bennett scored Murder on the Orient Express but still reaches for some pretty obvious cues (did we really need a cue that evokes Delta blues and reprises the title song when we see Endicott’s Black workforce harvesting his coton?), but for the most part it’s a stunning piece of filmmaking that only shows how far backwards we’ve gone. And I liked the fact that the film uses what’s come to be called “the ‘N’-word” several times, always in the spirit of condemning racism rather than expressing it; these people have stewed in their own racist contempt for so long we really need to hear them say that word!