Friday, October 27, 2017

Theodora Goes Wild (Columbia, 1936)

by Mark Gabrish Conlan • Copyright © 2017 by Mark Gabrish Conlan • All rights reserved

I ran Charles and I a 1936 movie called Theodora Goes Wild, which I’d heard about for years but mostly from Bob Thomas’s biography of Columbia Pictures studio head Harry Cohn. Thomas said that the filmmakers, director Richard Boleslavsky and writer Sidney Buchman (adapting a more-or-less “original” story by Mary McCarthy, not the writer who became famous in the 1960’s for her novel The Group but an earlier Mary McCarthy whose best credit was probably the screenplay for Dudley Nichols’ alternative-health masterpiece Sister Kenny in 1946), had raised Cohn’s ire by deliberately making the opening of their film boring until the titular “wild” heroine returns to a small town carrying a baby — but that happens only at the very end of the movie and what precedes it isn’t boring at all. Theodora Goes Wild begins in the small town of Lynnfield, Connecticut, where the local townspeople — especially the Lynnfield Literary Society, a group of middle-aged and older women with a highly puritanical sense of “morality” — are up in arms over the decision of Lynnfield Daily Bugle editor Jed Waterbury (Thomas Mitchell) to publish a serial version of The Sinner, the scandalous novel by Caroline Adams that has become America’s number one best seller. (Given that Theodora Goes Wild was made just two years after similar women’s clubs and the Legion of Decency, the censorship arm of America’s Roman Catholic Church, had clamped down on Hollywood and forced it to get serious about enforcing the Production Code, I couldn’t help but think McCarthy and Buchman meant this as a satire of censorship in general and in particular how the movies had been forced to give up the relative moral honesty and freedom of the so-called “pre-Code” era.)

The campaign to stop the Bugle from publishing The Sinner is led by the three Lynn sisters, daughters of the founder of the town, and their niece Theodora Lynn (Irene Dunne). We then cut to a scene in New York, where Arthur Stevenson (Thurston Hall, considerably less overbearing and more human than usual), publisher of The Sinner, is about to meet with Caroline Adams — and of course it turns out that “Caroline Adams” is really Theodora Lynn, who wrote the book under a pseudonym but now finds herself blocked on a second novel because she can’t write for fear her townspeople will discover her secret. She goes out with Stevenson, his wife and Michael Grant (Melvyn Douglas), who drew the sexy cover for The Sinner, and rather unconvincingly protests that she’d thought she was writing an innocent romance novel and didn’t realize how steamy it was until she heard one of the women’s club members read part of it aloud at their meeting. She’s also hyper-concerned about not revealing her secret, but her cover gets blown when she starts ordering straight whiskeys, gets drunk, goes home with Michael Grant and (this being a 1936 movie) escapes with her virtue (and, we suspect, her virginity) intact but leaves behind some papers than enable him to trace her. Michael blackmails Theodora into hiring him as a gardener for the Lynn estate and, in the usual fashion of a 1930’s movie hero, tries to get Theodora to fall in love with him by annoying her. He whistles — there’s a great scene in which Theodora tries to drown him out by playing the Lynn family piano and singing (and yes, it’s Irene Dunne’s own voice: she was an operatically trained mezzo-soprano who auditioned for the Met but decided to sign with RKO and make movies instead) — and pressures her into going out with him to the countryside, where they pick blackberries and fish. (One wonders if the inclusion of a fishing scene was, uh, “inspired” by the similar, and even funnier, fishing scene in MGM’s Libeled Lady the same year.) The gag, of course, is Theodora is great at those tasks while Michael is hopeless. Michael finally breaks down Theodora’s resistance and leads her to abandon her small-town values and become more like the woman she wrote her best-seller about, only just when Theodora thinks they’re going to run off together Michael leaves her a note that explains that now that she’s liberated the two of them will be better off alone.

It turns out that the reason for Michael’s sudden departure is he has a secret of his own — he’s married, and while he and his wife are estranged they’re staying together for the sake of the political career of Michael’s father, who’s the lieutenant governor of New York state and has insisted that Michael (who already betrayed the family’s financial-industry tradition by walking out on his bank job and becoming an artist) stay married at least for the duration of his term in office. There’s an acid little comment about the governor also having a penchant for dating beautiful women other than his wife that sort-of anticipates Buchman’s script for Mr. Smith Goes to Washington three years later. The film’s second act is an obvious turning of the tables, as now it’s Theodora, in “Caroline Adams” guise, pushing Michael to break free of his oppressive family and lifestyle, which she accomplishes by getting herself named as co-respondent first in publisher Stevenson’s divorce case and then in Michael’s (and there are lots of neat cut-ins to the reaction of the people back home in Lynnfield as every new development in Theodora’s love life gets reported in huge bold banner headlines in the Bugle), and of course ultimately Michael divorces his wife and he and Theodora get together. In case you’re wondering where the baby comes in, she’s actually the daughter of Theodora’s cousin Adelaide and the rather milquetoast husband (Roger Taylor) she met in college, but when she shows up at the Lynnfield train station (to a heroine’s welcome) with the kid in tow, that’s just one more frisson for the townspeople. I thought Theodora Goes Wild was a sheer delight, but Charles was considerably less taken with it; he said that today the actions of the Melvyn Douglas character would be read as stalking and sexual harassment rather than the charming, devil-may-care rakishness the filmmakers intended — and even though the second act set up the situation so she could turn the tables on him, Charles said that didn’t work for him because it only made her less likable. My one problem with this film was that it’s hard to believe Theodora was really so innocent about the content of what she had written: the plot might have worked better if she had originally given her manuscript a more anodyne title and been genuinely shocked when her publisher renamed it The Sinner and played up the sex aspects in his promotion.

Still, I think it’s a lovely comedy, atmospherically directed by Boleslawsky (who’d die the next year in the middle of filming Joan Crawford’s Cinderella farce The Bride Wore Red — Dorothy Arzner replaced him and got sole credit) and so beautifully acted by the leads it’s hard to believe it was ever pitched to anyone else. According to an imdb.com “Trivia” poster, it was originally intended for Marion Davies and Clark Gable as a follow-up to their 1936 film Cain and Mabel (which I haven’t seen in decades but I recall as not very good, even though Davies remains one of Hollywood’s most underrated talents and she was quite good in comic roles), and when she turned it down it was pitched to Carole Lombard — who would have been great in Theodora’s comic moments but wouldn’t have brought the underlying seriousness to the small-town side of the character that Dunne did. The only other actress I thought of while watching the film was Katharine Hepburn, mainly because I think Dunne was copying Hepburn’s flaring intonation to make herself believable as a New Englander (which Hepburn was for real and the Kentucky-born Dunne wasn’t), but Dunne was the right choice for the role even though it seems odd that this was one of the five films in which she was nominated for an Academy Award and one would have thought her other 1936 role, as Magnolia Hawks Ravenal in James Whale’s film of Jerome Kern’s Show Boat, would have been more deserving.